0

I'm building a custom module which needs a grid and edit form for my model. I managed to build the grid from a tutorial and my edit controller works as well. However, there is no content being rendered and I get this error:

[2017年05月30日 10:48:12] main.INFO: Cache file with merged layout: LAYOUT_adminhtml_STORE1_395a947ddb2d131e0726ca40a8f539941 and handles default, slideshow_slide_edit: Please correct the XML data and try again. [] []

my layout slideshow_slide_edit.xml:

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<page xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" layout="admin-2columns-left" xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="../../../../../../../lib/internal/Magento/Framework/View/Layout/etc/page_configuration.xsd">
<body>
 <referenceBlock name="left">
 <block class="Myvendor\Slideshow\Block\Adminhtml\Slide\Edit\Tabs"
 name="myvendor_slideshow_slide.edit.tabs"/>
 </referenceBlock>
 <referenceBlock name="content">
 <block class="Myvendor\Slideshow\Block\Adminhtml\Slide\Edit" name="myvendor_slideshow_slide.edit"/>
 </referenceBlock>
</body>

The Slide/Edit Block is obviously constructed as some additional buttons appear, and with some die-debugging I was able to confirm the Slide/Edit/Tabs Block is constructed as well, but neither of them have any content. I am not even sure where to look for my mistake.

asked May 30, 2017 at 11:01

1 Answer 1

1

you are missing a the closing </page> tag. probably that caused your XML File to be incorrect, the rest looks fine to me.

also you should change xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="../../../../../../../lib/internal/Magento/Framework/View/Layout/etc/page_configuration.xsd" to xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation="urn:magento:framework:View/Layout/etc/page_configuration.xsd" this is not neccessary but it's recommended to use the relative path

answered Jun 2, 2017 at 12:06
1
  • Thanks. Unfortunately, the </page> tag was merely lost in copy paste, it is present in the file. I changed the schema location, but as you expected that makes no difference. I begin to suspect the layoutfile might not be the problem since the constructors of both blocks do get called after all. Commented Jun 6, 2017 at 8:08

Your Answer

Draft saved
Draft discarded

Sign up or log in

Sign up using Google
Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Required, but never shown

Post as a guest

Required, but never shown

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.