I have heard this but I cannot confirm it. Does anyone know?
 asked Mar 6, 2017 at 16:54
 
 
 
 LM_Fielding 
 
 1,5634 gold badges29 silver badges51 bronze badges
 
 2 Answers 2
It is true, you can see it mentioned the Dev Docs too if you want extra confirmation :
To create an uncacheable page, mark any block on that page as uncacheable in the layout using cacheable="false".
You can see that on this page.
- 
 So should this situation be avoided at all costs?LM_Fielding– LM_Fielding2017年03月07日 09:55:43 +00:00Commented Mar 7, 2017 at 9:55
- 
 1@LM_Fielding Unless you want to purposefully stop the whole page from being cached then yeah I would avoid. If you need to prevent one block from being cached take a look at hole punching methods.Ben Crook– Ben Crook2017年03月08日 09:49:53 +00:00Commented Mar 8, 2017 at 9:49
- 
 I'm aware of hole punching methods, but thank you for the great tip! That is the reason I'm asking.LM_Fielding– LM_Fielding2017年03月08日 12:31:18 +00:00Commented Mar 8, 2017 at 12:31
Yes it does. Full page cache will not be used on that page. But block cache and the rest works.
 answered Mar 6, 2017 at 17:25
 
 
 
 Daniel Ifrim 
 
 3,4742 gold badges25 silver badges36 bronze badges
 
 - 
 1Of note, FPC is often responsible for the majority of caching performance gains, so thinking 'oh I'm just disabling one cache out of like 12' is usually a bad idea.siliconrockstar– siliconrockstar2019年02月28日 21:58:42 +00:00Commented Feb 28, 2019 at 21:58
default