Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

Fix synchronous_mode/synchronous_mode_strict ignored when set to false #2709

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
drivebyer wants to merge 1 commit into zalando:master
base: master
Choose a base branch
Loading
from drivebyer:fix-disable-param

Conversation

@drivebyer
Copy link
Contributor

@drivebyer drivebyer commented Jul 31, 2024

In my use case, I import the package from https://github.com/zalando/postgres-operator/tree/master/pkg/apis/acid.zalan.do/v1 into my Golang project. In my project, I use Golang to populate the PostgreSQL resource, and then use client-go to create the resource. However, when updating the PostgreSQL resource, like setting spec.patroni.synchronousMode to false, it gets ignored after marshaling to a string because of the omitempty tag. In my opinion, these fields should not have the omitempty tag.

Copy link
Contributor Author

PTAL @FxKu

Copy link
Member

FxKu commented Aug 9, 2024
edited
Loading

hm - this is contrary to #1223. Always thought omitempty only omits the field when it's not specified, but not on false. But anyway, why is it important to list, when the mode is disabled? With a simple coalesce logic you should be able to check for nil and insert whatever you want.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@sdudoladov sdudoladov Awaiting requested review from sdudoladov sdudoladov is a code owner

@Jan-M Jan-M Awaiting requested review from Jan-M Jan-M is a code owner

@FxKu FxKu Awaiting requested review from FxKu FxKu is a code owner

@jopadi jopadi Awaiting requested review from jopadi jopadi is a code owner

@idanovinda idanovinda Awaiting requested review from idanovinda idanovinda is a code owner

@hughcapet hughcapet Awaiting requested review from hughcapet hughcapet is a code owner

@macedigital macedigital Awaiting requested review from macedigital

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /