• I think it would make sense to use the standard TimeInterval type here and convert it to the appropriate millisecond value to better match other Swift APIs
• the API is pretty verbose. What do you think of this?

public final class JSTimer {
 public init(_ after: TimeInterval, _ callback: @escaping () -> ())
 public static repeating(_ interval: TimeInterval, _ callback: @escaping () -> ())
}

@j-f1

I think it would make sense to use the standard TimeInterval type here and convert it to the appropriate millisecond value to better match other Swift APIs

It's reasonable. But unfortunately, TimeInterval is a type defined in Foundation and I don't want JavaScriptKit to depend on Foundation.

@j-f1

the API is pretty verbose. What do you think of this?

public final class JSTimer {
 public init(_ after: TimeInterval, _ callback: @escaping () -> ())
 public static repeating(_ interval: TimeInterval, _ callback: @escaping () -> ())
}

I'm not sure this would work. repeating still has to delegate to some initializer, but there isn't one in this case that would call setInterval, if we assume that the only present init calls setTimeout. Then it would have to look something like:

public final class JSTimer {
 public init(millisecondsDelay: Double, isRepeating: Bool = false, callback: @escaping () -> ())
 public static func repeating(millisecondsDelay: Double, callback: @escaping () -> ())
}

Maybe we could just add a default false value on isRepeating without adding static func repeating? WDYT?