Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

feat: describe jsx transpilation #1069

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
atk wants to merge 37 commits into solidjs:main
base: main
Choose a base branch
Loading
from atk:feat/how-it-works
Open

Conversation

@atk
Copy link
Contributor

@atk atk commented Feb 11, 2025

  • I have read the Contribution guide
  • This PR references an issue (except for typos, broken links, or other minor problems)

Description(required)

The current docs are missing information on how solid works under the hood, especially the JSX transpilation. I aim to fill this gap with the current PR

Related issues & labels

./.

incognitojam reacted with thumbs up emoji
Copy link

Review PR in StackBlitz Codeflow Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Feb 11, 2025
edited
Loading

Deploy Preview for solid-docs ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit a4081c2
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/solid-docs/deploys/67d72f07598bbf00084b0660
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-1069--solid-docs.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

kodiakhq bot added 27 commits February 13, 2025 15:10
Copy link
Collaborator

@amirhhashemi amirhhashemi left a comment
edited
Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This contains a lot of valuable information about how Solid works. Nice job. However, I'm uncertain if it aligns well with our docs. Even in the advanced section, I think it's too technical to be useful to most people.

The section on Hyperscript is helpful for those who want to use Solid without a build step (there's an issue regarding this), but I would prefer to have a more practical guide about it.

If we had a blog, I would share this information there, as it would be a shame to lose it. Especially the information about custom renderers is interesting. Overall, I don't think this is a good fit for our docs.

Copy link
Collaborator

brenelz commented Aug 1, 2025

What do we want to do with this pr?

Copy link
Member

Needs to be reviewed still. I haven't had the time and other people haven't been available to @brenelz

brenelz reacted with thumbs up emoji

Copy link
Collaborator

amirhhashemi commented Aug 2, 2025
edited
Loading

I still don’t think this content is a good fit for our docs. The topics covered here feel way too advanced for most users. Unless someone is really interested in building a framework or digging deep into Solid, this page might just confuse them.

So, I suggest we close this PR and move the useful points (for average users) to other sections:

  • I noticed the createRenderer function isn’t documented yet. Tracked here.
  • After Solid 2.0, we should definitely document Hyperscript functions. Tracked here.

Copy link
Contributor Author

atk commented Aug 3, 2025

I really believe we should not leave these parts undocumented. I'll happily add a warning that these are advanced topics that are not required knowledge to use solid.js, but I am against leaving out content that might help advanced readers.

Meeting beginners is fine, ignoring advanced users is not.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@amirhhashemi amirhhashemi amirhhashemi left review comments

@LadyBluenotes LadyBluenotes Awaiting requested review from LadyBluenotes

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /