Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

Model checked with gradient boosting #84

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed

Conversation

@Pookie-n-Rookie
Copy link
Contributor

@Pookie-n-Rookie Pookie-n-Rookie commented May 14, 2024

As asked model is checked with gradient boosting and accuracy is compared with the Random Forest algorithm. But Random forest performed better and gives a better accuracy than Gradient Boosting techniques,ensembling methods like stacking or blending can sometimes combine the strengths of different algorithms, potentially yielding even better performance.But this case was a bit different.

Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Welcome to Our repository.🎊 Thank you so much for taking the time to point this out.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@sanjay-kv kindly look for the changes and merge my pull request. I have checked the accuracy of gradient boosting and compared it with random forest

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@github-actions github-actions[bot] github-actions[bot] left review comments

Projects

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /