-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 358
add paragraph describing independence of sibling subschemas #1018
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Made two minor suggestions. Otherwise, I think this is good to go.
@Relequestual your suggestions add a lot of redundancy ("such" everywhere).
Subschemas of these keywords evaluate the instance completely independently such that the results of one such subschema MUST NOT impact the results of sibling subschemas. As such the subschemas may be applied in any order.
@gregsdennis I've modified the second such (😆) instance. I just thought your phrasing was a little verbose and potentially not clearly related to the WHOLE previous section.
Co-authored-by: Ben Hutton <relequestual@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ben Hutton <relequestual@gmail.com>
merge when ready
No description provided.