Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

Loops: while and for #75

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
Moviss wants to merge 11 commits into javascript-tutorial:master
base: master
Choose a base branch
Loading
from Moviss:while_and_for

Conversation

@Moviss
Copy link

@Moviss Moviss commented Oct 27, 2020

No description provided.

Copy link

CLAassistant commented Oct 27, 2020
edited
Loading

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

Copy link

@AlenJakob AlenJakob left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

W lini 100 myśę , że słowo "potem" można zatąpić słowem "następnie"

Please make the requested changes. After it, add a comment "/done".
Then I'll ask for a new review 👻

Copy link
Author

Moviss commented Mar 11, 2021

W lini 100 myśę , że słowo "potem" można zatąpić słowem "następnie"

@Moviss Moviss reopened this Mar 11, 2021
Copy link
Author

Moviss commented Mar 11, 2021

/done

@@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
importance: 3
ważność: 3
Copy link
Member

@deivuss331 deivuss331 Oct 16, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please do not translate YAML metadata

@@ -1,20 +1,20 @@
importance: 4
ważność: 4
Copy link
Member

@deivuss331 deivuss331 Oct 16, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please do not translate YAML metadata


The value returned by the increment is not used here, so there's no difference between `i++` and `++i`.
Przyrost `i++` jest oddzielony od sprawdzenia warunku (2). To tylko kolejne stwierdzenie.
Wartość zwracana przez przyrost nie jest tutaj używana, więc nie ma różnicy między `i++` a `++i`.
Copy link
Member

@deivuss331 deivuss331 Oct 16, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please add a blank line between line 15 and 16

@@ -1,19 +1,19 @@
importance: 4
ważność: 4
Copy link
Member

@deivuss331 deivuss331 Oct 16, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please do not translate YAML metadata

@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
importance: 5
ważność: 5
Copy link
Member

@deivuss331 deivuss331 Oct 16, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please do not translate YAML metadata

@@ -1,14 +1,14 @@
importance: 5
ważność: 5
Copy link
Member

@deivuss331 deivuss331 Oct 16, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please do not translate YAML metadata

@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
importance: 5
ważność: 5
Copy link
Member

@deivuss331 deivuss331 Oct 16, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please do not translate YAML metadata

@@ -1,17 +1,17 @@
importance: 3
ważność: 3
Copy link
Member

@deivuss331 deivuss331 Oct 16, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please do not translate YAML metadata

Please make the requested changes. After it, add a comment "/done".
Then I'll ask for a new review 👻

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@deivuss331 deivuss331 deivuss331 requested changes

+1 more reviewer

@AlenJakob AlenJakob AlenJakob requested changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /