Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

WIP: Add HTTP/3 support #3925

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
seanmonstar wants to merge 1 commit into quic
base: quic
Choose a base branch
Loading
from http3
Draft

WIP: Add HTTP/3 support #3925

seanmonstar wants to merge 1 commit into quic from http3

Conversation

@seanmonstar
Copy link
Member

@seanmonstar seanmonstar commented Aug 4, 2025

This starts HTTP/3 support, making use of the traits in #3924, and integrating h3 into hyper::proto::h3.

It is not complete or working. I have divided attention, but figured I'd publish what I have working so far, in an effort to allow others to add on top of it. I'll keep this as a draft until it's close to working.

To make the diff easier to see, I'm making the target the quic branch. Note to self: switch it back before merging.

cc #1818

FireMasterK, siketyan, HigherOrderLogic, arloor, bzp2010, geoffsee, JoelStienlet, hatoo, simonmarty, cappuccinocosmico, and 11 more reacted with thumbs up emoji FireMasterK, arloor, geoffsee, hatoo, sebadob, finnbear, cappuccinocosmico, theoparis, dwosk, 0x676e67, and SR-Lut3t1um reacted with hooray emoji 0x676e67, FireMasterK, arloor, geoffsee, finnbear, Goliworks, arnaudpoullet-dkt, cappuccinocosmico, theoparis, dwosk, and 4 more reacted with rocket emoji
@seanmonstar seanmonstar changed the base branch from master to quic August 4, 2025 21:01
Copy link

@seanmonstar Hi there!

I've followed the http3 support discussions, and end up here. I've been thinking about contributing.

TBH, I haven't done an implementation like this, but I've seen in the PR that you introduced the impl blocks with todo!()s in the implementations.

I think I could study the architecture and maybe I could pull off some implementation, with your review, something useful might come out of it.

Do you have any plans for the next step so I could try to work in sync with you?

I'll soon make an attempt at it

seanmonstar reacted with heart emoji

Copy link
Member Author

@Rafael-Conde I don't personally have plans to focus on this PR at least this year, but if you'd like to try to make progress, you're welcome :)

Copy link

@seanmonstar Ok then! Can I iterate in the implementation with your feedback reviewing it?

I'll likely fall into pitfalls due to the lack of experience in this area, but I'll try my best here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /