-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
refactor(data): use ownershipCheckMiddleware to prevent duplicate DB ... #36
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. Weβll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
...calls - Replace direct database call with fetched data from ownershipCheckMiddleware - Remove redundant read operation, improving efficiency - Ensure existing user object is still properly validated and used
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @fulleni, I'm Gemini Code Assist1 ! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
I've refactored the data update logic within the API routes to optimize database interactions. Specifically, I've leveraged the ownershipCheckMiddleware to provide the existing user data, thereby preventing a redundant database call when performing partial updates. This change improves efficiency by ensuring that the necessary data is already available in the request context.
Highlights
- Database Optimization: The _handlePut method now retrieves the existing user object from the request context, which is populated by the ownershipCheckMiddleware, eliminating a duplicate database read.
- Code Refactoring: Streamlined the data update flow in routes/api/v1/data/[id]/index.dart by integrating with the ownershipCheckMiddleware for efficient data access.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with π and π on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. β©
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a new ownershipCheckMiddleware to handle item ownership verification, which is a great initiative to centralize logic and improve performance by avoiding duplicate database calls. The refactoring in _handlePut correctly implements this new pattern.
However, the refactoring is incomplete. The _handleGet and _handleDelete methods still contain legacy ownership check logic, leading to unnecessary database queries that this PR aims to eliminate. My review includes a detailed comment on how to extend this refactoring to those methods to ensure consistency and fully realize the performance benefits across all relevant API endpoints.
Status
READY/IN DEVELOPMENT/HOLD
Description
Type of Change