-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
Add Diversity and Inclusion working group #48
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🚗 passing-by but look nice! I have some suggestions.
template.md
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it a mistake? It would preferable to keep the template for others :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes pls it was a mistake
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No worries, if you re-add the template it will be no longer in the changes.
Co-authored-by: Sarah Abderemane <sarahabderemane@gmail.com>
Change .org to .com in the the WG email address
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking promising! Some changes to make for clarity. Something that isn’t clear to me generally is how much the group would work on implementation of the policies / initiatives it decides on.
@Arya-AD @AfiMaameDufie when you have the chance, could you add a description or comment to the PR that explains the status of this proposal? It’s not clear how much reviews you’re expecting at this stage from interested contributors or board members / how much you want new members?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
more direct = better? The DSF doesn’t do much currently so I think we need a group that drives.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This feels evident so I don’t think this needs to be in the group’s responsibilities?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don’t understand what a D&I liaison is, I think this needs either more specific "liaison" tasks, or on the opposite replace with a more generic "Supporting mentorship programs like Djangonaut Space to achieve diversity and inclusion goals"?
When I see "liaison" I generally think of a single person, not a group.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this would be clearer as:
But for grant proposals, I don’t understand if we mean the DSF as grantor or grantee? Same question for membership, is the group recommending members for the DSF, or things the DSF should join?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don’t understand the difference between audits and reports in this context? And how this point is different to:
- Measuring, evaluating, and sharing the DSF’s progress towards its diversity initiatives on a regular basis.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This feels pretty harsh (depending on how literally you interpret this I suppose?). Not sure if that’s your intention. Also note yearly elections of the DSF Board are held close to the christmas period where lots of people are away, and there can be other elections in theory if Board members left during the year.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I’m not sure if the plan is to complete this before or after the group’s initial formation?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
None of our other WGs do monthly reports, this feels very ambitious. Why do you suggest this frequency?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don’t understand the difference between "final proposal" and "new standards" when it comes to "new policy recommendations"?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This just repeats "comms" above?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
See #45