-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 302
feat: add parameter to changelog generation #1625
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
commitizen/commands/changelog.py
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
missing comma at the end of line.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah sorry, I tested locally and did the change directly in GitHub ...
But thanks it is being considered at least for release 4.11, I think it is a simple change with real benefit for many.
It'd be better to add test cases related to #1620, thanks.
fix of previous change/commit regarding same topic
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #1625 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 97.33% 98.25% +0.91% ========================================== Files 42 58 +16 Lines 2104 2694 +590 ========================================== + Hits 2048 2647 +599 + Misses 56 47 -9
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
... to identify incremental generation run in the jinja template.
This allows to include / exclude f. e. header lines form the current generation run to avoid multiple generation of header line(s)
Please refer to #1620