Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

BREAKING CHNAGE: Upgrade commit-check to v2.0.0 #152

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
shenxianpeng merged 10 commits into main from feature/v2
Oct 14, 2025
Merged

Conversation

@shenxianpeng
Copy link
Contributor

@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng commented Oct 13, 2025
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

What's New in v2

Important

This v2 release introduces several 🚨breaking changes. Please review the Breaking Changes section carefully before upgrading.

Breaking Changes

  • Removed support for commit-signoff, merge-base, and imperative inputs — now configured via commit-check.toml or cchk.toml.
  • Deprecated .commit-check.yml in favor of commit-check.toml or cchk.toml.
  • Changed default values of author-name and author-email inputs to false to align with the default behavior in commit-check.
  • Upgraded core dependency commit-check to v2.0.0.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Adds TOML-based configuration for commit and branch rules (v2).
  • Documentation

    • Added "What’s New in v2" with migration notes; updated usage, input descriptions, defaults and examples for v2.
  • Chores

    • Upgraded tooling to v2; removed legacy YAML config and deprecated inputs/options (commit-signoff, merge-base, imperative); changed author-name/email defaults and simplified pre-commit checks.
  • Workflows

    • PR checkout now uses branch ref; default release tag set to v2; removed some self-test inputs.

@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng requested a review from a team as a code owner October 13, 2025 07:08
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 13, 2025
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

Commit-check enforcement moved from inline action inputs and .commit-check.yml into a new commit-check.toml and upgraded to commit-check v2; three inputs/flags (commit-signoff, merge-base, imperative) were removed and workflows, README, action metadata, CLI invocation, and dependency were updated accordingly.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Config migration & dependency bump
\.commit-check.yml, commit-check.toml, requirements.txt
Removed inline YAML checks from \.commit-check.yml; added commit-check.toml with [commit] and [branch] policy keys (types, limits, rebase target, ignore lists); bumped commit-check from 0.10.22.0.0.
Action inputs & runtime cleanup
action.yml, main.py
Removed inputs/env flags commit-signoff, merge-base, imperative; removed their env mappings, logging prints, and CLI argument propagation; changed default for author-name to false.
Workflows
\.github/workflows/commit-check.yml, \.github/workflows/release.yaml
Deleted self-test inputs (commit-signoff, merge-base, imperative) from commit-check workflow; changed PR checkout to use branch ref (head.ref) and adjusted GITHUB_TOKEN comment; updated release workflow default tag and step names from v1v2.
Documentation
README.md
Added "What’s New in v2" / breaking changes noting removal of inputs and \.commit-check.yml; updated examples and usage to reference commit-check.toml and commit-check v2; removed sections for the removed flags and adjusted input descriptions/defaults.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
 autonumber
 participant Dev as Developer
 participant GH as GitHub Actions
 participant Action as commit-check Action
 participant Entrypoint as main.py
 participant CLI as commit-check CLI (v2)
 participant CFG as commit-check.toml
 Dev->>GH: Push / Open PR
 GH->>Action: Start commit-check job
 Action->>Entrypoint: Run composite action
 Entrypoint->>CLI: Execute commit-check (flags: message, branch, author-name, author-email...)
 CLI->>CFG: Load TOML policy (commit & branch rules)
 CLI-->>Entrypoint: Return results (pass / fail)
 Entrypoint-->>GH: Report outcome
 Note right of CFG: Enforcement moved from inline YAML/inputs to `commit-check.toml` and CLI v2
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes

Suggested labels

enhancement, documentation

Poem

I thump my paws: v2 hops in stride,
TOML maps rules where YAML did hide,
Old flags waved off, new defaults set true,
Workflows and tags lined up anew.
I nibble carrots — checks pass through! 🥕🐇

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title Check ⚠️ Warning The title clearly identifies the main change—upgrading commit-check to v2.0.0 and marking it as breaking—but contains a spelling mistake that undermines its clarity. Please correct the typo in "CHNAGE" to "CHANGE" so the title reads "BREAKING CHANGE: upgrade commit-check to v2.0.0."
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch feature/v2

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 13, 2025
edited
Loading

Commit-Check ✔️

@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng added breaking This is a breaking change major A major version bump labels Oct 13, 2025
@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng changed the title (削除) BREAKING CHNAGES: upgrade commit-check to v2.0.0 (削除ここまで) (追記) BREAKING CHNAGE: upgrade commit-check to v2.0.0 (追記ここまで) Oct 13, 2025
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 09d59e4 and f5fc99e.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • .commit-check.yml (0 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/release.yaml (2 hunks)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
  • commit-check.toml (1 hunks)
  • requirements.txt (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • .commit-check.yml
🔇 Additional comments (4)
requirements.txt (1)

3-3: Upgrade looks good.

Pin to commit-check 2.0.0 aligns with v2 migration.

README.md (2)

43-43: LGTM on action upgrade reference.

Switch to commit-check-action@v2 is correct.


144-145: Please provide the repository URL or package name for commit-check v2 so I can locate the canonical default configuration file (commit-check.toml) and its URL.

commit-check.toml (1)

1-23: Provide commit-check v2 docs link
Please share the GitHub repo or documentation URL for the commit-check tool (v2) you’re using so we can confirm that keys like subject_imperative, conventional_branch, and require_rebase_target are valid.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Caution

Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.

⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
README.md (1)

121-121: Update the config filename reference.

We now ship a commit-check.toml, yet the doc still instructs users to add .commit-check.yml. Following this guidance with v2 will silently fail because the CLI won’t read the YAML file. Please update the link and wording to .toml so users can customise successfully.

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)

41-43: Refresh the fetch-depth comment.

The merge-base input no longer exists in v2, so the "required for merge-base check" note is stale. Please reword to reflect the current need (e.g., fetching full history for rebase-target validation) or drop it.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 09d59e4 and c427042.

📒 Files selected for processing (8)
  • .commit-check.yml (0 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/commit-check.yml (0 hunks)
  • .github/workflows/release.yaml (2 hunks)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
  • action.yml (0 hunks)
  • commit-check.toml (1 hunks)
  • main.py (0 hunks)
  • requirements.txt (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (4)
  • .commit-check.yml
  • .github/workflows/commit-check.yml
  • main.py
  • action.yml

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4e5410a and 2d5dfe0.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • README.md (4 hunks)
  • action.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
README.md

15-15: Blank line inside blockquote

(MD028, no-blanks-blockquote)

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
README.md (1)

13-17: MD028 (no-blanks-blockquote) resolved

The spacer line inside the callout is now correctly prefixed with >. LGTM.

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)

135-135: Polish wording for clarity

Minor grammar tweak to improve readability.

-Note: the default rule of above inputs is following [this configuration](https://github.com/commit-check/commit-check-action/blob/main/commit-check.toml). If you want to customize, just add your [`commit-check.toml`](https://commit-check.github.io/commit-check/configuration.html) config file under your repository root directory.
+Note: the default behavior of the above inputs follows [this configuration](https://github.com/commit-check/commit-check-action/blob/main/commit-check.toml). To customize, add a [`commit-check.toml`](https://commit-check.github.io/commit-check/configuration.html) file at the repository root.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2d5dfe0 and 6cbe8b5.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
README.md (3)

20-23: Breaking changes list is clear and consistent

Bullets accurately reflect input removals and defaults moving to commit-check.toml. LGTM.


25-25: Verify release notes link/date before merging

Ensure the tag v2.0.0 and the date shown in What's New match the actual release.

Would you confirm the tag exists and the date is correct?


65-66: Defaults aligned with v2 behavior

Setting author-name and author-email to false by default matches the stated breaking change. LGTM.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (5)
README.md (5)

18-21: Tighten "Breaking Changes" wording for clarity

Minor phrasing improvements to avoid "dropped support ... moved" ambiguity and reference v2 defaults.

-- Dropped support for `commit-signoff`, `merge-base`, and `imperative` inputs which are moved to new config file `commit-check.toml`.
+- Removed action inputs `commit-signoff`, `merge-base`, and `imperative`; these are now configured in `commit-check.toml`.
 - Dropped support for `.commit-check.yml` in favor of `commit-check.toml`.
-- Changed default values of `author-name` and `author-email` inputs to `false` to align with commit-check default configuration.
+- Changed defaults for `author-name` and `author-email` inputs to `false` to align with commit‐check v2 defaults.

61-62: Omit redundant inputs (already default false)

Docs say these default to false; removing keeps the example minimal.

- author-name: false
- author-email: false

93-93: Polish wording for message description

Small grammar/casing tweak.

-- **Description**: check git commit message following [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/).
+- **Description**: Check Git commit messages follow [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/).

98-98: Polish wording for branch description

Small grammar/casing tweak.

-- **Description**: check git branch name following [Conventional Branch](https://conventional-branch.github.io/).
+- **Description**: Check Git branch names follow [Conventional Branch](https://conventional-branch.github.io/).

131-131: Clarify "Note" grammar and pluralization

-Note: the default rule of above inputs is following [this configuration](https://github.com/commit-check/commit-check-action/blob/main/commit-check.toml). If you want to customize, just add your [`commit-check.toml`](https://commit-check.github.io/commit-check/configuration.html) config file under your repository root directory.
+Note: the default rules for the above inputs follow [this configuration](https://github.com/commit-check/commit-check-action/blob/main/commit-check.toml). To customize, add your own [`commit-check.toml`](https://commit-check.github.io/commit-check/configuration.html) at the repository root.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2d5dfe0 and 1f6c524.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
README.md (1)

11-15: v2 section and callout look good

Clear, concise, and lint-friendly. No issues.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
README.md (1)

53-55: Make checkout ref robust for push and PR events

${{ github.event.pull_request.head.sha }} is undefined on push events; provide a fallback to github.sha so the example works for both.

Apply:

- ref: ${{ github.event.pull_request.head.sha }} # Checkout PR HEAD commit
+ ref: ${{ github.event.pull_request.head.sha || github.sha }} # PR HEAD on PRs; current SHA on pushes
 fetch-depth: 0 # Required for merge-base checks
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
README.md (3)

93-93: Tighten phrasing (grammar/style)

Use imperative style consistent with others.

- - **Description**: check git commit message following [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/).
+ - **Description**: Check Git commit messages follow [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/).

98-98: Tighten phrasing (grammar/style)

Match tense/capitalization.

- - **Description**: check git branch name following [Conventional Branch](https://conventional-branch.github.io/).
+ - **Description**: Check Git branch names follow [Conventional Branch](https://conventional-branch.github.io/).

131-131: Clarify note (grammar + clarity)

Small grammar polish and clearer wording.

-Note: the default rule of above inputs is following [this configuration](https://github.com/commit-check/commit-check-action/blob/main/commit-check.toml). If you want to customize, just add your [`commit-check.toml`](https://commit-check.github.io/commit-check/configuration.html) config file under your repository root directory.
+Note: the default behavior of the inputs above follows [this configuration](https://github.com/commit-check/commit-check-action/blob/main/commit-check.toml). To customize, add a [`commit-check.toml`](https://commit-check.github.io/commit-check/configuration.html) file at the root of your repository.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6cbe8b5 and 1f6c524.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
README.md (4)

11-22: v2 summary reads well

Clear breaking changes and migration notes. Looks good.


54-54: Confirm need for full history with v2

Is fetch-depth: 0 still required for default v2 config? If merge-base rules are disabled, consider fetch-depth: 1 for speed. If enabled via commit-check.toml, keep 0.


61-62: Defaults change acknowledged

Setting author-name and author-email to false matches v2 defaults. Good.


104-104: Default noted

Default value update documented correctly.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
README.md (1)

53-58: Example checkout must include a fallback ref.

The Usage snippet runs on push, but github.event.pull_request.head.ref is empty there, so anyone copying this fails checkout. Reintroduce a fallback (e.g. || github.ref_name) to keep the example runnable.

- ref: ${{ github.event.pull_request.head.ref }} # Checkout PR branch
- fetch-depth: 0 # Required for merge-base checks
+ ref: ${{ github.event.pull_request.head.ref || github.ref_name }} # PR branch on PRs; branch on push/dispatch
+ fetch-depth: 0 # Required for merge-base checks
 - uses: commit-check/commit-check-action@v2
 env:
- GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} # Needed for PR comments
+ GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} # Needed for PR comments
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1f6c524 and 31b4871.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • .github/workflows/commit-check.yml (1 hunks)
  • README.md (4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
.github/workflows/commit-check.yml (1)
main.py (2)
  • main (197-210)
  • add_pr_comments (111-177)

Comment on lines +17 to 22
ref: ${{ github.event.pull_request.head.ref }} # Checkout PR branch
fetch-depth: 0 # Required for merge-base checks
- uses: ./ # self test
env:
GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} # use GITHUB_TOKEN because of use pr-comments
GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} # Needed for PR comments
with:
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot Oct 13, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

Restore checkout fallback for non-PR runs.

github.event.pull_request.head.ref is undefined during workflow_dispatch, so checkout receives an empty ref and the workflow aborts on manual runs. Please fall back to github.ref_name/github.sha so both PR and dispatch executions work.

- ref: ${{ github.event.pull_request.head.ref }} # Checkout PR branch
+ ref: ${{ github.event.pull_request.head.ref || github.ref_name }} # PR branch on PRs; dispatch/push fallback
📝 Committable suggestion

!!️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
ref: ${{ github.event.pull_request.head.ref }} # Checkout PR branch
fetch-depth: 0 # Required for merge-base checks
- uses: ./ # self test
env:
GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} # use GITHUB_TOKEN because of use pr-comments
GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} # Needed for PR comments
with:
ref: ${{ github.event.pull_request.head.ref || github.ref_name }} # PR branch on PRs; dispatch/push fallback
fetch-depth: 0 # Required for merge-base checks
- uses: ./ # self test
env:
GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} # Needed for PR comments
with:
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
.github/workflows/commit-check.yml around lines 17 to 22: the checkout step
currently uses github.event.pull_request.head.ref which is undefined for
workflow_dispatch and causes failures; change the ref input to fall back to a
dispatch/commit ref by using a conditional expression that uses
github.event.pull_request.head.ref when present, otherwise github.ref_name (or
github.sha) so manual runs and PR runs both work; update the env/with block to
set ref: to that fallback expression (e.g. use the GitHub Actions expression OR
chain) so checkout always receives a valid ref.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 31b4871 and eb895f4.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • commit-check.toml (1 hunks)

subject_imperative = true
subject_max_length = 80
subject_min_length = 5
allow_commit_types = ["feat", "fix", "docs", "style", "refactor", "test", "chore", "ci"]
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot Oct 13, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

Restore the full Conventional Commit type set.

We reference the Conventional Commits spec here, but allow_commit_types omits core types like build and perf. Any contributors using those standard types will now be blocked. Please add the missing spec-defined types so we don’t introduce false negatives.

-allow_commit_types = ["feat", "fix", "docs", "style", "refactor", "test", "chore", "ci"]
+allow_commit_types = ["feat", "fix", "docs", "style", "refactor", "test", "chore", "ci", "build", "perf"]
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In commit-check.toml at line 8, the allow_commit_types list omits standard
Conventional Commit types (e.g., build, perf, revert) which will block valid
commits; update the allow_commit_types array to include the missing spec-defined
types such as build, perf, and revert (in addition to the existing entries) so
the configuration accepts the full conventional set.

@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng changed the title (削除) BREAKING CHNAGE: upgrade commit-check to v2.0.0 (削除ここまで) (追記) BREAKING CHNAGE: Upgrade commit-check to v2.0.0 (追記ここまで) Oct 14, 2025
@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng merged commit d009e35 into main Oct 14, 2025
6 of 7 checks passed
@shenxianpeng shenxianpeng deleted the feature/v2 branch October 14, 2025 06:39
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
README.md (1)

53-55: Make checkout ref robust for push and PR (and fork PRs); clarify fetch-depth comment

Using github.event.pull_request.head.ref fails on push events and can target a non-existent branch on forks. Prefer a SHA fallback so the example works across events. Also clarify why full history is needed.

- ref: ${{ github.event_pull_request.head.ref }} # Checkout PR branch
- fetch-depth: 0 # Required for merge-base checks
+ ref: ${{ github.event.pull_request.head.sha || github.sha }} # PR HEAD on pull_request; current SHA on push
+ fetch-depth: 0 # Full history required for range/merge-base computations
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
README.md (2)

11-22: Add "What’s New in v2" to the Table of Contents

Improve discoverability by adding this section to the TOC near the top.


131-131: Tighten wording for clarity

Minor grammar/readability improvement.

-Note: the default rule of above inputs is following [this configuration](https://github.com/commit-check/commit-check-action/blob/main/commit-check.toml). If you want to customize, just add your [`commit-check.toml`](https://commit-check.github.io/commit-check/configuration.html) config file under your repository root directory.
+Note: defaults for the above inputs are defined by [this configuration](https://github.com/commit-check/commit-check-action/blob/main/commit-check.toml). To customize, add your own [`commit-check.toml`](https://commit-check.github.io/commit-check/configuration.html) at the repository root.
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between eb895f4 and d36e878.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
README.md (5)

57-57: LGTM: token/env and permissions alignment

Using GITHUB_TOKEN with pull-requests: write matches the PR comments guidance.


61-62: LGTM: updated defaults for author checks

Defaults set to false align with v2 breaking changes.


93-93: LGTM: Conventional Commits description

Description accurately reflects enforcement.


98-98: LGTM: Conventional Branches link

Good reference to the spec.


104-104: LGTM: default clarified

Default false matches the new behavior.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@coderabbitai coderabbitai[bot] coderabbitai[bot] left review comments

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

breaking This is a breaking change major A major version bump

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /