Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings
This repository was archived by the owner on Mar 6, 2024. It is now read-only.

refactor: provide summary to review stage, lower temperature to 0 #5

Closed
harjotgill wants to merge 11 commits into main from summary_desc

Conversation

@harjotgill
Copy link
Contributor

@harjotgill harjotgill commented Mar 11, 2023
edited by github-actions bot
Loading


This change is Reviewable

Summary by ChatGPT

Release Notes:

  • Refactor: This pull request refactors the code to provide a summary to the review stage, lower temperature to 0, remove chatgpt-api submodule, update README with an AI image, add a new summary field to the Inputs class and move the summary stage before the review stage.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 11, 2023
edited
Loading

🤖 ChatGPT

Thank you for letting me participate in the code review. The purpose of this pull request is to refactor the code to provide a summary to the review stage, lower temperature to 0, remove chatgpt-api submodule, update README with an AI image, add a new summary field to the Inputs class and move the summary stage before the review stage.

Overall, the changes seem fine as they are minor updates to the code. However, I would suggest that the developer should add more details in the pull request description to help reviewers understand the changes better.

Filename Summary
.github/workflows/chatgpt-review.yml Set review_comment_lgtm flag to false.
.gitmodules Removed chatgpt-api submodule.
README.md Added AI image and removed a line.
src/options.ts Added summary field to Inputs class.
src/review.ts Moved the summary stage before the review stage and added a new summary field to the Inputs class.

let next_review_ids = review_begin_ids

for (const [
filename,
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot Mar 11, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 ChatGPT

This patch adds a new stage to summarize the diff and generate release notes. The code seems well-structured and easy to follow. No issues found.

LGTM!

}
} else {
core.info(
`skip sending diff of file: ${inputs.filename} due to token count: ${file_diff_tokens}`
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot Mar 11, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 ChatGPT

This patch removes the code that summarizes the diff. It seems like this functionality has been moved to a new stage in the code. No issues found.

LGTM!

if (!options.review_comment_lgtm && response.match(/lgtm/i)) {
continue
}
try {
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot Mar 11, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 ChatGPT

This patch updates the code to skip commenting if the response contains "LGTM" (case insensitive). This is a good improvement as it will reduce unnecessary comments. No issues found.

LGTM!

// Write a function that takes diff for a single file as a string
// and splits the diff into separate patches

const split_patch = (patch: string | null | undefined): string[] => {
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot Mar 11, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 ChatGPT

This patch removes the final summary and release notes stages from the code. It seems like these stages have been moved to a new stage in the code. No issues found.

LGTM!

with:
debug: true
review_comment_lgtm: true
review_comment_lgtm: false
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot Mar 11, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 ChatGPT

Patch review for .github/workflows/chatgpt-review.yml:

The change made in this patch is to set the review_comment_lgtm flag to false. This flag controls whether or not a "LGTM" comment is automatically posted when a pull request is reviewed.

This change seems reasonable, as it may be more appropriate to manually post an "LGTM" comment after reviewing the code, rather than having it done automatically. However, it would be good to confirm with the team if this is the desired behavior before merging the pull request.

Overall, this patch seems fine to me.

LGTM!

This GitHub Action is based on
This GitHub Action is based on
[ChatGPT Action](https://github.com/unsafecoerce/chatgpt-pr-reviewer)
by [Tao He](https://github.com/sighingnow).
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot Mar 11, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 ChatGPT

LGTM! The removal of the line about special thanks seems fine as it doesn't seem to affect the functionality of the action.

summary: string
filename: string
file_content: string
file_diff: string
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot Mar 11, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 ChatGPT

This patch modifies the Inputs class to include a new summary field. This looks good to me. LGTM!

summary = '',
filename = '',
file_content = '',
file_diff = '',
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot Mar 11, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 ChatGPT

This patch modifies the Inputs class constructor to include a new summary field. This looks good to me. LGTM!

this.summary = summary
this.filename = filename
this.file_content = file_content
this.file_diff = file_diff
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot Mar 11, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 ChatGPT

This patch modifies the Inputs class constructor to set the new summary field. This looks good to me. LGTM!

}
if (this.filename) {
content = content.replace('$filename', this.filename)
}
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot Mar 11, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 ChatGPT

This patch modifies the Inputs class render method to handle the new summary field. This looks good to me. LGTM!

temperature = '0.0'
) {
this.debug = debug
this.chatgpt_reverse_proxy = chatgpt_reverse_proxy
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot Mar 11, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 ChatGPT

This patch modifies the Options class constructor to set the default temperature to 0.0 instead of 0.2. This looks good to me. LGTM!

let next_review_ids = review_begin_ids

for (const [
filename,
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot Mar 11, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 ChatGPT

The code looks good and well-structured. However, there is a lot of nesting and indentation in the codeReview function. Consider breaking down the function into smaller functions to make it more readable and easier to understand.

}
} else {
core.info(
`skip sending diff of file: ${inputs.filename} due to token count: ${file_diff_tokens}`
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot Mar 11, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 ChatGPT

It seems that the code is removing the summarize_diff_ids variable and the code for summarizing the diff. This may be intentional, but if not, consider adding back the code for summarizing the diff to provide a summary of the changes made in the file.

if (!options.review_comment_lgtm && response.match(/lgtm/i) !== null) {
continue
}
try {
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot Mar 11, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 ChatGPT

The code looks good. However, the regular expression used to match "LGTM" is case-insensitive, which may result in false positives if there are other words that contain "lgtm". Consider using a more specific regular expression or checking for an exact match of "LGTM".

// Write a function that takes diff for a single file as a string
// and splits the diff into separate patches

const split_patch = (patch: string | null | undefined): string[] => {
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot Mar 11, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 ChatGPT

It seems that the code is removing the final summary and release notes sections. This may be intentional, but if not, consider adding back the code for summarizing the changes made in the pull request and adding them to the description field of the PR as release notes.

with:
debug: true
review_comment_lgtm: true
review_comment_lgtm: false
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot Mar 11, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 ChatGPT

The change in .github/workflows/chatgpt-review.yml seems fine. The review_comment_lgtm flag is set to false, which means that the bot will not automatically add an LGTM comment on the pull request. This can be useful if the team wants to encourage more thorough reviews and discussions before approving a pull request.

LGTM!

This GitHub Action is based on
This GitHub Action is based on
[ChatGPT Action](https://github.com/unsafecoerce/chatgpt-pr-reviewer)
by [Tao He](https://github.com/sighingnow).
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot Mar 11, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 ChatGPT

LGTM! The developer has removed a line that mentions the base of the GitHub Action, which is not necessary.

summary: string
filename: string
file_content: string
file_diff: string
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot Mar 11, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 ChatGPT

This patch adds a new field summary to the Inputs class. This change seems fine and does not introduce any issues. LGTM!

summary = '',
filename = '',
file_content = '',
file_diff = '',
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot Mar 11, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 ChatGPT

This patch adds a default value for the new summary field in the constructor of the Inputs class. This change seems fine and does not introduce any issues. LGTM!

this.summary = summary
this.filename = filename
this.file_content = file_content
this.file_diff = file_diff
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot Mar 11, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 ChatGPT

This patch initializes the new summary field in the constructor of the Inputs class. This change seems fine and does not introduce any issues. LGTM!

}
if (this.filename) {
content = content.replace('$filename', this.filename)
}
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot Mar 11, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 ChatGPT

This patch adds a check for the new summary field in the render() method of the Inputs class. This change seems fine and does not introduce any issues. LGTM!

temperature = '0.0'
) {
this.debug = debug
this.chatgpt_reverse_proxy = chatgpt_reverse_proxy
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot Mar 11, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 ChatGPT

This patch changes the default value of temperature in the Options class from '0.2' to '0.0'. This change seems fine and does not introduce any issues. LGTM!

let next_review_ids = review_begin_ids

for (const [
filename,
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot Mar 11, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 ChatGPT

This patch adds a new feature to summarize the diff and generate release notes using ChatGPT. The code looks good, but I have a few suggestions:

  1. Consider adding error handling for the await octokit.pulls.update calls in case they fail.
  2. In the release_notes_response block, consider breaking down the logic into smaller functions to improve readability and maintainability.
  3. Consider adding comments to explain the purpose and behavior of each section of the code.

Overall, this patch is well-written and adds useful functionality to the codebase. LGTM!

}
} else {
core.info(
`skip sending diff of file: ${inputs.filename} due to token count: ${file_diff_tokens}`
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot Mar 11, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 ChatGPT

This patch removes the summarize_diff functionality from the code. The code looks good, and there are no bug risks or improvement suggestions. LGTM!

// Write a function that takes diff for a single file as a string
// and splits the diff into separate patches

const split_patch = (patch: string | null | undefined): string[] => {
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot Mar 11, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🤖 ChatGPT

This patch removes the summarize_final_response and release_notes_response functionality from the code. The code looks good, and there are no bug risks or improvement suggestions. LGTM!

@harjotgill harjotgill deleted the summary_desc branch March 11, 2023 17:08
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Reviewers

1 more reviewer

@github-actions github-actions[bot] github-actions[bot] left review comments

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /