-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.8k
added changes to your bellmanford.js #1861
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Open
+1
−2
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
@Ujwal200707
Ujwal200707
requested review from
appgurueu and
raklaptudirm
as code owners
November 26, 2025 05:12
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The change replaces the final loop with a direct return statement.
Previously, the code looped through all vertices to find the destination and then returned its distance. This loop was unnecessary because the destination index is already known.
By using:
return dis[dest]
the code becomes more efficient and readable.
It removes redundant iterations, reduces time complexity for that part from O(V) to O(1), and makes the function cleaner without affecting the output.