Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly
Sign up
Appearance settings

interactions of elements csharp code added in github #1728

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
harsha509 merged 4 commits into SeleniumHQ:trunk from rpallavisharma:interactioncsharp-pallavi
May 30, 2024

Conversation

@rpallavisharma
Copy link
Member

@rpallavisharma rpallavisharma commented May 17, 2024 •
edited
Loading

User description

Thanks for contributing to the Selenium site and documentation!
A PR well described will help maintainers to review and merge it quickly

Before submitting your PR, please check our contributing guidelines.
Avoid large PRs, and help reviewers by making them as simple and short as possible.

Description

interactions of elements csharp code added in github

Motivation and Context

code was not on github and current displayed wasn't correct

Types of changes

  • Change to the site (I have double-checked the Netlify deployment, and my changes look good)
  • Code example added (and I also added the example to all translated languages)
  • Improved translation
  • Added new translation (and I also added a notice to each document missing translation)

Checklist

  • I have read the contributing document.
  • I have used hugo to render the site/docs locally and I am sure it works.

PR Type

enhancement, documentation

Description

  • Added a new test method TestInteractionCommands in InteractionTest.cs to demonstrate various web element interactions using ChromeDriver.
  • Included assertions to validate the state of web elements after interactions.
  • Updated English, Japanese, Portuguese, and Chinese documentation to include new CSharp code examples.
  • Removed outdated CSharp code snippets from documentation.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Enhancement
InteractionTest.cs
Add comprehensive interaction tests for web elements

examples/dotnet/SeleniumDocs/Elements/InteractionTest.cs

  • Added a new test method TestInteractionCommands for various
    interactions like click, send keys, and clear.
  • Utilized ChromeDriver for browser operations.
  • Added assertions to verify the behavior of web elements.
  • Browser is properly closed after test execution.
    • +44/-1
    Documentation
    interactions.en.md
    Update English documentation with new CSharp code examples

    website_and_docs/content/documentation/webdriver/elements/interactions.en.md

  • Updated CSharp code examples to reflect the new interaction tests.
  • Removed outdated CSharp code snippets.
    • +13/-29
    interactions.ja.md
    Update Japanese documentation with new CSharp code examples

    website_and_docs/content/documentation/webdriver/elements/interactions.ja.md

  • Updated CSharp code examples to reflect the new interaction tests.
  • Removed outdated CSharp code snippets.
    • +12/-30
    interactions.pt-br.md
    Update Portuguese documentation with new CSharp code examples

    website_and_docs/content/documentation/webdriver/elements/interactions.pt-br.md

  • Updated CSharp code examples to reflect the new interaction tests.
  • Removed outdated CSharp code snippets.
    • +9/-29
    interactions.zh-cn.md
    Update Chinese documentation with new CSharp code examples

    website_and_docs/content/documentation/webdriver/elements/interactions.zh-cn.md

  • Updated CSharp code examples to reflect the new interaction tests.
  • Removed outdated CSharp code snippets.
    • +11/-30

    💡 PR-Agent usage:
    Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

    Copy link

    netlify bot commented May 17, 2024 •
    edited
    Loading

    👷 Deploy request for selenium-dev pending review.

    Visit the deploys page to approve it

    Name Link
    🔨 Latest commit 48dc102

    @qodo-merge-pro qodo-merge-pro bot added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request labels May 17, 2024
    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Description updated to latest commit (58baaf7)

    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Review 🔍

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]

    2, because the PR involves a moderate amount of new code primarily focused on adding new test methods and updating documentation. The changes are straightforward and localized to specific files, making the review process less complex.

    🧪 Relevant tests

    Yes

    ⚡ Possible issues

    Possible Bug: The assertion Assert.AreEqual(isChecked, false); in the TestInteractionCommands method assumes the checkbox is initially unchecked. If the default state changes or varies, this test could fail. Consider adding a setup step to ensure the checkbox state.

    Code Quality: The repeated pattern of finding an element, performing an action, and then verifying could be refactored into helper methods to improve code readability and reusability.

    🔒 Security concerns

    No

    Copy link
    Contributor

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    CategorySuggestion Score
    Best practice
    Replace implicit waits with explicit waits for better test reliability

    Replace the use of implicit waits with explicit waits to improve the robustness of the
    test. Implicit waits can lead to unpredictable wait times and make the tests flaky.
    Explicit waits are more flexible and can wait for specific conditions.

    examples/dotnet/SeleniumDocs/Elements/InteractionTest.cs [15] 

    -driver.Manage().Timeouts().ImplicitWait = TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(500);
+WebDriverWait wait = new WebDriverWait(driver, TimeSpan.FromSeconds(10));
+wait.Until(drv => drv.FindElement(By.Name("checkbox_input")).Displayed);
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    Why: The suggestion correctly identifies the use of implicit waits and proposes a switch to explicit waits, which is a best practice in Selenium testing for more predictable and reliable test outcomes.

    		8
    Robustness
    Add exception handling to WebDriver interactions to manage runtime errors

    Add exception handling around the WebDriver interactions to gracefully handle possible
    runtime errors such as elements not being found or not being clickable.

    examples/dotnet/SeleniumDocs/Elements/InteractionTest.cs [20-21] 

    -IWebElement checkInput = driver.FindElement(By.Name("checkbox_input"));
-checkInput.Click();
+try
+{
+ IWebElement checkInput = driver.FindElement(By.Name("checkbox_input"));
+ checkInput.Click();
+}
+catch (NoSuchElementException ex)
+{
+ Console.WriteLine("Element not found: " + ex.Message);
+}
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: Adding exception handling around WebDriver interactions is a good practice to make the tests more robust by handling runtime errors gracefully. The suggestion is relevant and improves the code's robustness.

    		7
    Maintainability
    Ensure the browser is always closed by using a finally block

    Ensure the browser is quit even if the test fails by placing driver.Quit() in a finally
    block. This prevents browser windows from hanging open if there are errors during test
    execution.

    examples/dotnet/SeleniumDocs/Elements/InteractionTest.cs [49] 

    -driver.Quit();
+try
+{
+ // Test commands
+}
+finally
+{
+ driver.Quit();
+}
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: Placing driver.Quit() inside a finally block ensures that the browser is closed even if the test fails, which is crucial for preventing resource leaks and maintaining clean test environments. This is a valuable suggestion for better resource management.

    		7
    Readability
    Use boolean-specific assertions for clarity

    Use Assert.IsTrue or Assert.IsFalse for boolean conditions to make the assertions more
    readable and intention-revealing.

    examples/dotnet/SeleniumDocs/Elements/InteractionTest.cs [25] 

    -Assert.AreEqual(isChecked, false);
+Assert.IsFalse(isChecked);
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6

    Why: The suggestion to use Assert.IsFalse instead of Assert.AreEqual for boolean conditions enhances readability and makes the intention clearer, which is a good improvement for code clarity.

    		6

    Copy link
    Member

    @harsha509 harsha509 left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Thank you @pallavigitwork !

    @harsha509 harsha509 merged commit b262a15 into SeleniumHQ:trunk May 30, 2024
    selenium-ci added a commit that referenced this pull request May 30, 2024 
    ...ite]
Co-authored-by: Sri Harsha <12621691+harsha509@users.noreply.github.com> b262a15
    Copy link
    Member Author

    Thank you @harsha509 :)

    @rpallavisharma rpallavisharma deleted the interactioncsharp-pallavi branch September 27, 2024 12:09
    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

    Reviewers

    @harsha509 harsha509 harsha509 approved these changes

    Assignees

    No one assigned

    Labels

    documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request Review effort [1-5]: 2

    Projects

    None yet

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /