Wikipedia:Dispute resolution requests/Edit warring
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Please read before accusing someone of edit warring
Edit Warring (3RR) Edit warring is a behavior, typically exemplified by the use of confrontational edits to win a content dispute. It is different than a bold, revert, discuss (BRD) cycle. Reverting vandalism and banned users is not edit warring; at the same time, content disputes, even egregious point of view edits and other good-faith changes do not constitute vandalism. Administrators often must make a judgment call to identify edit warring when cooling disputes. Administrators currently use several measures to determine if a user is edit warring.
To request an examination of an editor who is suspected of edit warring visit the Administrator's Noticeboard Edit Warring page and follow the instructions there.
Main page: Wikipedia:Dispute resolution
Dispute resolution requests provides a central compilation and easy-access overview of noticeboards for dispute resolution , and details the various different methods used at each of the Wikipedia dispute resolution pages. Unsure which one to use? Check our guide to dispute resolution.
| Article content
All content issues should first be discussed at the talk page of the relevant article. | ||||||||||||
|
| User conduct
All conduct issues should first be discussed at the talk page of the users involved. | |||||||||
|
| Advanced disputes | |||
|
See also
[edit ]- Help:Simple guide to vandalism cleanup, for situations where an editor is clearly deliberately trying to harm Wikipedia.
- Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations, for situations where an editor is suspected of abusively using two or more Wikipedia accounts.