User talk:fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four

I can see what gave you LLM vibes from Mediascriptor's post, but to be honest I get the same impression from the thread's OP. Fruit of the poison tree concerns aside, it introduces the possibility that they're mimicking the OP's syntax. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:52, 8 July 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

For additional verification you can run the last paragraphs of their reply from "I would like to express my sincerest" to "engaged with me during my time here" through a detector of your choice. gptzero.me, which seems to be popular for this application, returns 100% ai-generated.

I did not collapse based off of a detector, but my own judgement along with other technical tells. It was not just the obviously broken formatting. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 22:05, 8 July 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

@Fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four: Please I want to know why you nominated the article JoBlaq for deletion. Did it fail notability? The article got reliable sources. And secondary sources too. 2RDD (talk) 21:46, 11 July 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

From the deletion discussion: "All substantial mentions appear to be the type of unreliable promotional coverage cautioned against by WP:NEWSORGNIGERIA". fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 21:49, 11 July 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

how is it promotional though? 2RDD (talk) 21:53, 11 July 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

If you've read articles like [1] [2] [3] and not found them to be unreliable and promotional, then we simply see things differently. Others will weigh in at the AfD, possibly they will see things as you do as well. Thank you. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 21:56, 11 July 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

@Fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four: I have created articles. If you check articles like Fanum, You will find sources of which you will think it's promotional. IShowSpeed and Kai Cenat. 2RDD (talk) 22:01, 11 July 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. I have stated my case, you disagree, that is fine. Please keep further deletion discussion to the relevant page and not on my talk page. Thank you. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 22:13, 11 July 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

@Fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four: In this case, you failed NPPHOUR, please follow the recommended NPP practices. 2RDD (talk) 22:17, 11 July 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

This was not a new article, it is an article from 30 June. I draftified the article [4] citing the same concerns I've raised in the AfD. My concerns were not addressed when you moved it back into articlespace. Do not post on my talk page about this topic, broadly construed, again. Thank you. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 22:34, 11 July 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

@Fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four: ohh, I see where the error is. It looks like promotional contents though. You are kinda right. 2RDD (talk) 22:56, 11 July 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

It feels like, because I am likely to be indeffed, InsanityClown is going open season on me... SPIs, AfDs, snarky comments on my talk page...

What the hell? _pbp 22:37, 22 July 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Hi @pbp, my talk page is not an appropriate venue to discuss this, let's keep things to the ANI thread. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 23:24, 22 July 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Hi there this user [5], and this user [6] are sock accounts of Prince of Roblox [7] they have very typical ways of editing always based on Islamophobic edits and highly anti-Pakistan and Pro India and Pro Hindu edits just report on the sock investigation page they are well known and admins block this vandal quickly and revert asap as they create dozens of accounts to edit again the articles need protection I think as they just come back as they have no life 90.213.219.215 (talk) 18:36, 1 September 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

[8], I wanted to wait until they had more than a single edit each. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 20:25, 1 September 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Hi and thanks for your recent participation in AfD. I would like to hear your thoughts about the process. Please check this survey if you are willing to respond.Czarking0 (talk) 02:12, 6 October 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

fifteen? something else? of course, hopefully we can interact at happier places than ANI as well. although thank you for your constructive contributions there and WT:AIC NicheSports (talk) 01:24, 16 October 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

fifteen is fine, 15,224 is another common choice, and fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four works as well if you'd like to pad out the (+bytecount). Thanks for your LLM cleanup efforts also. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 01:38, 16 October 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

fifteen it is! NicheSports (talk) 01:42, 16 October 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Hey, there. There's a discussion over at WP:RSN#Voice123 as a source if you are interested in it. Thanks, Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 05:45, 20 October 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Hello again. I do apologize if I was a little desperate and confused in my good-faith efforts to improve the Emily Neves article, especially with regards to finding potential sources for her early life. Also, I've opened a discussion at Talk:Emily Neves#B-class/GA-class efforts, if you are interested in helping out of course. Thanks, sjones23 (talk - contributions) 20:22, 21 October 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Just Googled up the ZIP code minutes ago. --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 23:28, 24 October 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

​A reasonable guess! But there's no relation to any ZIP codes. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 23:40, 24 October 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

You're the sixth one, is that it? Mathglot (talk) 23:50, 30 October 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Sorry to disappoint, but there's no relation to any numeric sequence or mathematics in general.​ fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 00:21, 31 October 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Hello, Fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four. This message is being sent to remind you of significant upcoming changes regarding logged-out editing.

Starting 4 November, logged-out editors will no longer have their IP address publicly displayed. Instead, they will have a temporary account (TA) associated with their edits. Users with some extended rights like administrators and CheckUsers, as well as users with the temporary account IP viewer (TAIV) user right will still be able to reveal temporary users' IP addresses and all contributions made by temporary accounts from a specific IP address or range.

How do temporary accounts work?

• When a logged-out user completes an edit or a logged action for the first time, a cookie will be set in this user's browser and a temporary account tied with this cookie will be automatically created for them. This account's name will follow the pattern: ~2025-12345-67 (a tilde, year of creation, a number split into units of 5).
• All subsequent actions by the temporary account user will be attributed to this username. The cookie will expire 90 days after its creation. As long as it exists, all edits made from this device will be attributed to this temporary account. It will be the same account even if the IP address changes, unless the user clears their cookies or uses a different device or web browser.
• A record of the IP address used at the time of each edit will be stored for 90 days after the edit. Users with the temporary account IP viewer (TAIV) user right will be able to see the underlying IP addresses.
• As a measure against vandalism, there are two limitations on the creation of temporary accounts:
  • There has to be a minimum of 10 minutes between subsequent temporary account creations from the same IP (or /64 range in case of IPv6).
  • There can be a maximum of 6 temporary accounts created from an IP (or /64 range) within a period of 24 hours.

Temporary account IP viewer user right

• Administrators may grant the temporary account IP viewer (TAIV) user right to non-administrators who meet the criteria for granting. Importantly, an editor must make an explicit request for the permission (e.g. at WP:PERM/TAIV)—administrators are not permitted to assign the right without a request.
• Administrators will automatically be able to see temporary account IP information once they have accepted the Access to Temporary Account IP Addresses Policy via Special:Preferences or via the onboarding dialog which comes up after temporary accounts are deployed.

Impact for administrators

• It will be possible to block many abusers by just blocking their temporary accounts. A blocked person won't be able to create new temporary accounts quickly if the admin selects the autoblock option.
• It will still be possible to block an IP address or IP range.
• Temporary accounts will not be retroactively applied to contributions made before the deployment. On Special:Contributions, you will be able to see existing IP user contributions, but not new contributions made by temporary accounts on that IP address. Instead, you should use Special:IPContributions for this (see a video about IPContributions in a gallery below).

Rules about IP information disclosure

• Publicizing an IP address gained through TAIV access is generally not allowed (e.g. ~2025-12345-67 previously edited as 192.0.2.1 or ~2025-12345-67's IP address is 192.0.2.1).
• Publicly linking a TA to another TA is allowed if "reasonably believed to be necessary". (e.g. ~2025-12345-67 and ~2025-12345-68 are likely the same person, so I am counting their reverts together toward 3RR , but not Hey ~2025-12345-68, you did some good editing as ~2025-12345-67)
• See Wikipedia:Temporary account IP viewer § What can and can't be said for more detailed guidelines.

Useful tools for patrollers

• It is possible to view if a user has opted-in to view temporary account IPs via the User Info card, available in Preferences → Appearance → Advanced options → Tick Enable the user info card
  • This feature also makes it possible for anyone to see the approximate count of temporary accounts active on the same IP address range.
• Special:IPContributions allows viewing all edits and temporary accounts connected to a specific IP address or IP range.
• Similarly, Special:GlobalContributions supports global search for a given temporary account's activity.
• The auto-reveal feature (see video below) allows users with the right permissions to automatically reveal all IP addresses for a limited time window.

Videos

Further information and discussion

• For more information and discussion regarding this change, please see the announcement from the Wikimedia Foundation at Wikipedia:Village pump (WMF) § Temporary accounts rollout.

Most of this message was written by Mz7 (source). Thanks, 🎃 SGrabarczuk (WMF) (talk) 02:47, 31 October 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

I noticed your message about my edit on the Battle for Dream Island page about my edit adding in Flash-animated. This hasn't been an issue with other web series Wikipedia pages? Eddsworld has the same "Flash-animated" marking too though suddenly no one bats an eye? None of the first paragraph in Battle for Dream Island contains any sources to begin with so I'm lost here. ConeKota (talk) 22:04, 2 November 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

@ConeKota As explained on your talk page, the lede needs to follow WP:LEADCITE, which requires that all information in it be supported. Either with a citation in the lede, or the information being present and supported with a citation in the body. This edit has no supporting citation in the lede, and is not present nor supported in the body.

This hasn't been an issue with other web series Wikipedia pages? – If you find other pages with information that is not compliant with WP:V and WP:LEADCITE, then please be bold and correct it. The fact that there exist other places in the encyclopedia where the verifiability policy has failed to be upheld, does not mean we can ignore it elsewhere. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 22:13, 2 November 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

Also I would like to point you to the broader WP:LEAD guideline, and specifically highlight the first sentence which states that a lead is a summary of [an article's] most important contents. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 22:24, 2 November 2025 (UTC) [reply ]