Talk:Unity of command

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

WikiProject icon

Military history : Technology

WikiProject icon

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject . If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

B checklist

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
Taskforce icon	Military science, technology, and theory task force

Neutral point of view?

[edit ]

This article reads like an essay promoting unity of command, but it needs sources; for instance, the conslusion, "The unity of command principle is not only hypothetically sensible, but it has been proven that, throughout military history, unity of command has been indeed valuable," requires examples. Indeed, without specific citations or examples, "it has been proven that..." seems almost weasel-worded. 2600:1003:B021:DD1A:0:0:A57F:3201 (talk) 01:26, 5 June 2015 (UTC) [reply ]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Unity_of_command&oldid=1205843530"