Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:Traditional method

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon Food and drink : Wine Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Related taskforces:
/
Taskforce icon
This article is within the scope of Wines task force, a project which is currently considered to be inactive .
WikiProject Wine open tasks:
vieweditdiscusshistorywatch

Merge to Sparkling wine production?

[edit ]

It has been suggested that Traditional method be merged into Sparkling wine production. I think it is a bad idea. There is so much text about the traditional method that it completely overshadows the other six methods, and gives the impression that the traditional method (and champagne in particular) is the only important one. That is not the case, in fact it is commonly estimated that merely 15 % of the world production is champagne. With the finer points of the traditional method now in a separate article it is far easier to appreciate the differences between the metods in the Sparkling wine production article. --Klättermusen (talk) 12:40, 17 May 2016 (UTC) [reply ]

History of the content of this page

[edit ]

When creating this page I copied a fair deal of content from Sparkling wine production ; see that page's history for attribution. I basically split the Sparkling wine production article in half to create Traditional method, then added some new content and rearranged it to make the content more coherent. I was not aware that Wikipedia requires that this must be made very clear up-front. Mea culpa! --Klättermusen (talk) 05:48, 23 May 2016 (UTC) [reply ]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /