Talk:Redundant code
Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
A merge makes sense. Is the final article called redundant code or dead code? We could call it Has no effect on the output code ;-) Derek farn 09:24, 10 October 2006 (UTC) [reply ]
Vis-a-vis standard and published definitions of dead code, redundant code, and unreachable code,[1] [2] I have updated and changed the articles for dead code, redundant code, and unreachable code. --Dorchard (talk) 22:41, 20 October 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
- ^ Debray, S. K., Evans, W., Muth, R., and De Sutter, B. 2000. Compiler techniques for code compaction. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 22, 2 (Mar. 2000), 378-415.
- ^ Appel, A. W. 1998 Modern Compiler Implementation in Java. Cambridge University Press.
Should not exist
[edit ]This article should not exist. It is just an adjective before a notable term (ABNT). Redundant code is simply code that is redundant ... in the usual meaning of the word redundant. Stevebroshar (talk) 17:05, 27 August 2025 (UTC) [reply ]