Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:Multireference configuration interaction

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon Physics Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

For me choosing the configuration for the CI-space from some references is done always by taking singly, doubly, ... excited configurations relative to all reference. I do not know what is meant by "chosen by the program according to some perturbation theoretical ansatz according to a threshold provided by the user". Maybe this can be explained or taken into a new paragraph, describing this different/special method.

CSFs are not necessarily determinants

[edit ]

The third sentence start with 'The higher excited determinants (also called configuration state functions (CSFs) or shortly configurations)...'. However, a CSF is a linear combination of determinants, and not always one determinant. The linear coefficients are called spin coupling coefficients. A CSF is equal to one determinant if and only if all orbitals are doubly occupied in the respective configuration. Libavius (talk) 17:08, 3 February 2020 (UTC) [reply ]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /