Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:Jury nullification

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jury nullification article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives : 1, 2, 3 Auto-archiving period: 30 days
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon Law Mid‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law , an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors :

  • [[Not proven#Not guilty|not proven]] The anchor (#Not guilty) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links.

Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error

Comment

[edit ]

Camden 28. Go to www.camden28.org. US 1973 Antiwar trial. Defendants found not guilty by jury despite being caught in act of the distruction of draft files.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Pbcouming (talkcontribs) 14:10, 13 July 2007

UK Section - Colston 4/Bristol 4

[edit ]
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/jan/04/jury-in-colston-statue-trial-urged-to-be-on-the-right-side-of-history
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-59892211
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/colston-bristol-verdict-city-history-b1988937.html
https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/colston-4-cleared-bristol-city-6447349
https://thebristolactivist.com/2022/01/06/not-guilty-colston-4-acquitted-by-jury-majority/

213.249.161.145 (talk) 18:28, 8 January 2022 (UTC) [reply ]

See also
- http://insulatebritain.com/2023/05/15/breaking-high-noon-at-crown-court/
- https://juststopoil.org/2023/07/17/breaking-dozens-more-people-risk-prison-for-literally-upholding-the-law/
- https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/activists-jailed-for-seven-weeks-for-defying-ban-on-mentioning-climate-crisis/
- https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/climate-activists-risk-contempt-charges-over-placards-outside-court-mkxqk5rtx Chorl (talk) 14:44, 31 July 2023 (UTC) [reply ]
I've added a paragraph to the UK section for this; one might want to add one for the Bristol verdict Chorl (talk) 11:40, 3 August 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

Explain what is being nullified

[edit ]

For a reader unfamiliar with the common law system, the term "jury nullification" may intuitively mean that either the jury or its verdict is nullified, which (as I understand it now) is not the case: the term apparently means that the jury nullifies the law for this case. It would be good if this was explained early in the intro. – gpvos (talk) 16:20, 17 October 2023 (UTC) – gpvos (talk) 16:20, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /