Jump to content
Wikipedia The Free Encyclopedia

Talk:Human–computer interaction

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The content of Human–computer interaction (security) was merged into Human–computer interaction on 20 November 2022. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page.
Human–computer interaction (security) was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 27 June 2022 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Human–computer interaction. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This article was copy edited by a member of the Guild of Copy Editors .Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors
WikiProject icon Computing Top‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon Computer science Top‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science
Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:
WikiProject icon Sociology Mid‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon Computer security : Computing Low‐importance
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer security , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer securityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer securityTemplate:WikiProject Computer securityComputer security
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance).
Things you can help WikiProject Computer security with:
Article alerts are available, updated by AAlertBot. More information...
  • Review importance and quality of existing articles
  • Identify categories related to Computer Security
  • Tag related articles
  • Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
  • Identify articles for improvement
  • Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
  • Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human–Computer Interaction, a project which is currently considered to be inactive .Human–Computer InteractionWikipedia:WikiProject Human–Computer InteractionTemplate:WikiProject Human–Computer InteractionHuman–Computer Interaction

icon To-do list for Human–computer interaction: edit · history · watch · refresh · Updated 2020年08月08日


Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - FA22 - Sect 201 - Thu

[edit ]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 September 2022 and 8 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kathyljy (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Kathyljy (talk) 12:52, 27 October 2022 (UTC) [reply ]

Split request Human-Computer Integration from Human-Computer Interaction

[edit ]

I have created a page for Human-Computer Integration (Draft:Human-computer integration), which was declined and I have been asked to discuss it here to make a split from the Human-Computer Interaction page. So, I would like to discuss the split from the HCI-page. Enitaeng (talk) 13:47, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

Functionally, your current draft reads like a position, tutorial, or workshop paper. Which could definitely be valuable, but not necessarily as an article on Wikipedia. (For example, most of the article conflicts with the original research policy.) Why did you write this essay? I think it could be reasonable to include a paragraph on Human-computer Integration (not a term I was familiar with) as a new section in Current Research. That said, from looking at the sourcing it seems like this is primarily a paradigm championed by a single lab/set of researchers? We do have articles like that (e.g. for Value sensitive design), but usually after broader adoption by the community. Suriname0 (talk) 21:59, 16 May 2023 (UTC) [reply ]
Thank you for your feedback. Could you be specific about why this looks like original research, as the content is loaded with state-of-the-art references from different fields of study / schools of thought. (1) This is what the field of Human-Computer Integration is at right now, it is a field emerging at this moment, seen as an extension of Human-Computer Interaction (see this literature review: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10447318.2023.2177797?journalCode=hihc20 and this paper https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9913891 & and even https://www.designsociety.org/1307/Design+Science+Journal%2C+Thematic+Collection%3A+Understanding+People+-+Extensions+of+Human+Computer+Interaction). So, in stead of being a paradigm only being championed by a single lab/ set of researchers, I approached this as an upcoming field of study that will evolve in the next couple of years. (2) Another question I would have is 'why does it need to have a broader adoption by a community, as the information is placed in an academically-oriented construct?'. (3) What kind of adoption is necessary and which community decides this? This field will be highly interdisciplinary, so therefore it might need another perspective.
I would like to ask you to have a look at it again, and provide some more specific feedback about why it is seen as 'original research', based on the arguments here above. What makes it seem like that to you? Sincerely thank you in advance! Enitaeng (talk) 08:13, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [reply ]
I continue to be a little confused with your goals writing this article. Are you hoping to increase awareness of Human-Computer Integration as a sub-discipline? If so, you might be better served publishing this as a position paper or similar. The reason the article reads like "original research" to me is because it seems to contain improper synthesis; many disparate sources are being connected in the article that aren't already discussed together in reliable sources. In an article on HInt, we could briefly summarize what is in sources like the Barbosa et al. lit review or the Mueller et al. position paper. However, it's tough to build an article on this kind of source because Wikipedia treats them as primary sources in some contexts and secondary sources in others.
Regarding your specific questions, I'm concerned by language like "emerging at this moment" and "will be highly interdisciplinary", which suggests a field in rapid flux or that an article would need to by speculative; Wikipedia is not a Crystal Ball. By "adoption", I'm not quoting any particular Wikipedia policy, but suggesting a useful rule of thumb for determining if Wikipedia should have an article about an academic concept or sub-field. At a minimum, I would expect to see significant evidence that scholars are treating the field as a serious trend, e.g. by citing papers that discuss it, by hosting workshops and/or conferences on the topic, by publishing edited volumes or journal editions on that theme, by summarizing progress in the field in wider venues like Interactions magazine, etc. Suriname0 (talk) 12:57, 17 May 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

Wiki Education assignment: INFO 505 - Foundations of Information Science

[edit ]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 August 2023 and 11 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Nik2608 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: TheChosenOneAnakin, Chillimune, Mayoosan, Blackshadow005, AyeshaBD.

— Assignment last updated by Mayoosan (talk) 01:58, 12 December 2023 (UTC) [reply ]

Ai

[edit ]

Human computer interaction 196.191.79.182 (talk) 11:06, 1 December 2024 (UTC) [reply ]

Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - SP25 - Sect 202 - Thu

[edit ]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 January 2025 and 30 April 2025. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kl5528 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Kl5528 (talk) 01:40, 6 April 2025 (UTC) [reply ]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /