Talk:Grammar-oriented programming
Page contents not supported in other languages.
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Proposed deletion This page was proposed for deletion by HyperAccelerated (talk · contribs) on 10 May 2024.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Grammar-oriented programming article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
- Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
- New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.
- Assume good faith
- Be polite and avoid personal attacks
- Be welcoming to newcomers
- Seek dispute resolution if needed
Article policies
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
Delete?
[edit ]As has been pointed out in the comments below, this article is not based on facts (or the references are still missing) and might in essence be close to Language-oriented_programming (which is based on facts). Therefore I suggest to delete it. JThanx (talk) 13:29, 29 May 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
Dead link
[edit ]http://www.arsanjani.org/GOOD is dead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.171.219.138 (talk) 13:02, 25 July 2013 (UTC) [reply ]
is this any different from Language-oriented_programming? Bayle Shanks (talk) 07:56, 6 October 2009 (UTC) [reply ]
All sources appear to point to the same access-for-pay article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.94.91.145 (talk) 16:47, 20 June 2010 (UTC) [reply ]