Talk:Doctrinal paradox
Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. | ||||||||||||||||||||
Simpson's paradox
[edit ]I recommend that we add a link to Simpson's paradox, as this seems to be a subset of that, independently discovered. I made my wikipedia account only about 2 minutes ago, and so I'm reluctant to do anything to this article myself. 23chaosmosis (talk) 02:15, 16 May 2014 (UTC) [reply ]
Untitled
[edit ]I know the professor in question, he said:
"But I merely generalized the doctrinal paradox in the law, which Christian List’s bibliography must cite, and it was only with Christian himself (in our 2002 paper) that I showed that it arises even under non-majority voting procedures that meet certain conditions." 2605:A601:A08A:C200:A19F:F26:74E9:FAAB (talk) 02:28, 5 January 2024 (UTC) [reply ]