Talk:Chirp spread spectrum
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. | |||||||||||||||
Reading helps. Clarity is provided with the references. Not all known references are publicly accessible. wireless friend (talk) 11:08, 25 April 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
Technical/ethical question: Does ambient temperature have any connection to choice of modulation? Or is "Some areas where this type of technology can be useful are medical applications, logistics (i.e. containers need to be tracked), and government/security applications. Nanotron even tested the TRX Transceiver for industrial monitoring and control in a steel mill and it survived when the computer and display that were interfacing with it failed because of the heat" just advertising? 62.183.179.122 (talk) 17:06, 4 February 2013 (UTC) [reply ]
nanoLOC is another such system
[edit ]nanoLOC, produced by Nanotron Technologies GmbH, Germany, also produces ranging devices using CSS. --Pot (talk) 09:37, 3 July 2013 (UTC) [reply ]
LoRa, the growing technology, seems to use CSS
[edit ]13:38, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit ]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Chirp spread spectrum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080515215417/http://www.commnexus.org/programs/special-interest-groups/the-revenge-of-chirp-spread-spectrum.php to http://www.commnexus.org/programs/special-interest-groups/the-revenge-of-chirp-spread-spectrum.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:04, 14 July 2017 (UTC) [reply ]
Presence of logo
[edit ]Moving this from a talk page:
The Chirp Spread Spectrum modulation is not a product, brand, or company. While I understand your effort, Chirp Spread Spectrum is a pretty generic concept, and there is no precedence for giving concepts and non-products logos. This is like if someone gave Water, Frequency modulation, or the Fourier transform a logo. If Chirp Spread Spectrum was given a logo by the company that created it, it could be added if it falls under copyright fair use, but I don't believe this is the case.
User RFgeek says:
"I personally custom designed this graphic for CSS and don't see any good reason why it should be removed but welcome feedback by other editors."
"Requires feedback from other editors not from the editor who revoked my edit. Editor argues that a frequency-specific logo is not appropriate; this is a CSS icon in the same way that WiFi has an icon. Given the limited popularity of CSS, the neutral branding (there is no organizational or individual affiliation being made) there is no justifiable reason to remove something that enhances the page"
From me:
The Wi-Fi logo has been created by the Wi-Fi Alliance, an organization which certifies and coordinates implementation of 802.11* protocols. Chirp Spread Spectrum has no such organization, nor is it a single standard for data transmission. Like I said, there is not reason to create a logo in such circumstances, as it is a generic idea.
I am willing to list this on Wikipedia:Third opinion for a 3rd party opinion, however it is recommended to discuss it here first. Kreuner (talk) 11:04, 16 December 2023 (UTC) [reply ]
- I would agree. The presence of a logo implies that there is a standards body or other organisation behind CSS, which there is not.
- This logo is not used anywhere else except Wikipedia. I believe this violates Wikipedia:No original research. Wikipedia articles should contain verifiable, published information, not introduce new ideas or content, such as a logo that isn't used or recognised outside Wikipedia.
- I believe this also violates Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, as it gives undue weight to a logo that is not used anywhere else for this concept, effectively endorsing it as "official".
- @RFgeek I appreciate you put a bunch of work into this, and it is a good-looking logo, but I don't believe it is appropriate for Wikipedia. Simonches (talk) 23:01, 7 August 2025 (UTC) [reply ]
- I've removed it, on account of multiple editors being against its inclusion (both here, and the other editors that have attempted to removed it from the page), and only RFgeek being in favour of its inclusion. Simonches (talk) 12:31, 23 August 2025 (UTC) [reply ]