Talk:Alameda Science and Technology Institute
Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Alameda Science and Technology Institute article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.
- Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
- New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.
- Assume good faith
- Be polite and avoid personal attacks
- Be welcoming to newcomers
- Seek dispute resolution if needed
Article policies
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject California , a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject icon This article is related to WikiProject Schools , a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Untitled
[edit ]What about the stuff saying of the negative downside to all of this? 71.134.229.247 (talk) 07:43, 14 June 2008 (UTC) [reply ]
- Yeah, it not only needs to be improved in terms of layout, and needs to be sourced/referenced, but what bothers me is that I've heard a lot of students say the negativity to ASTI that is never mentioned by ASTI itself. I suppose that is understandable, but this article still feels a little PoV to me. 99.48.54.185 (talk) 07:21, 24 January 2009 (UTC) [reply ]