Second-order cone programming
A second-order cone program (SOCP) is a convex optimization problem of the form
- minimize {\displaystyle \ f^{T}x\ }
- subject to
- {\displaystyle \lVert A_{i}x+b_{i}\rVert _{2}\leq c_{i}^{T}x+d_{i},\quad i=1,\dots ,m}
- {\displaystyle Fx=g\ }
where the problem parameters are {\displaystyle f\in \mathbb {R} ^{n},\ A_{i}\in \mathbb {R} ^{{n_{i}}\times n},\ b_{i}\in \mathbb {R} ^{n_{i}},\ c_{i}\in \mathbb {R} ^{n},\ d_{i}\in \mathbb {R} ,\ F\in \mathbb {R} ^{p\times n}}, and {\displaystyle g\in \mathbb {R} ^{p}}. {\displaystyle x\in \mathbb {R} ^{n}} is the optimization variable. {\displaystyle \lVert x\rVert _{2}} is the Euclidean norm and {\displaystyle ^{T}} indicates transpose.[1]
The name "second-order cone programming" comes from the nature of the individual constraints, which are each of the form:
- {\displaystyle \lVert Ax+b\rVert _{2}\leq c^{T}x+d}
These each define a subspace that is bounded by an inequality based on a second-order polynomial function defined on the optimization variable {\displaystyle x}; this can be shown to define a convex cone, hence the name "second-order cone".[2] By the definition of convex cones, their intersection can also be shown to be a convex cone, although not necessarily one that can be defined by a single second-order inequality. See below for a more detailed treatment.
SOCPs can be solved by interior point methods [3] and in general, can be solved more efficiently than semidefinite programming (SDP) problems.[4] Some engineering applications of SOCP include filter design, antenna array weight design, truss design, and grasping force optimization in robotics.[5] Applications in quantitative finance include portfolio optimization; some market impact constraints, because they are not linear, cannot be solved by quadratic programming but can be formulated as SOCP problems.[6] [7] [8]
Second-order cones
[edit ]The standard or unit second-order cone of dimension {\displaystyle n+1} is defined as
- {\displaystyle {\mathcal {C}}_{n+1}=\left\{{\begin{bmatrix}x\\t\end{bmatrix}}{\Bigg |}x\in \mathbb {R} ^{n},t\in \mathbb {R} ,\|x\|_{2}\leq t\right\}}.
The second-order cone is also known by the names quadratic cone or ice-cream cone or Lorentz cone. For example, the standard second-order cone in {\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{3}} is
- {\displaystyle \left\{(x,y,z){\Big |}{\sqrt {x^{2}+y^{2}}}\leq z\right\}}.
The set of points satisfying a second-order cone constraint is the inverse image of the unit second-order cone under an affine mapping:
- {\displaystyle \lVert A_{i}x+b_{i}\rVert _{2}\leq c_{i}^{T}x+d_{i}\Leftrightarrow {\begin{bmatrix}A_{i}\\c_{i}^{T}\end{bmatrix}}x+{\begin{bmatrix}b_{i}\\d_{i}\end{bmatrix}}\in {\mathcal {C}}_{n_{i}+1}}
and hence is convex.
The second-order cone can be embedded in the cone of the positive semidefinite matrices since
- {\displaystyle ||x||\leq t\Leftrightarrow {\begin{bmatrix}tI&x\\x^{T}&t\end{bmatrix}}\succcurlyeq 0,}
i.e., a second-order cone constraint is equivalent to a linear matrix inequality. The nomenclature here can be confusing; here {\displaystyle M\succcurlyeq 0} means {\displaystyle M} is a semidefinite matrix: that is to say
- {\displaystyle x^{T}Mx\geq 0{\text{ for all }}x\in \mathbb {R} ^{n}}
which is not a linear inequality in the conventional sense.
Similarly, we also have,
- {\displaystyle \lVert A_{i}x+b_{i}\rVert _{2}\leq c_{i}^{T}x+d_{i}\Leftrightarrow {\begin{bmatrix}(c_{i}^{T}x+d_{i})I&A_{i}x+b_{i}\\(A_{i}x+b_{i})^{T}&c_{i}^{T}x+d_{i}\end{bmatrix}}\succcurlyeq 0}.
Relation with other optimization problems
[edit ]When {\displaystyle A_{i}=0} for {\displaystyle i=1,\dots ,m}, the SOCP reduces to a linear program. When {\displaystyle c_{i}=0} for {\displaystyle i=1,\dots ,m}, the SOCP is equivalent to a convex quadratically constrained linear program.
Convex quadratically constrained quadratic programs can also be formulated as SOCPs by reformulating the objective function as a constraint.[5] Semidefinite programming subsumes SOCPs as the SOCP constraints can be written as linear matrix inequalities (LMI) and can be reformulated as an instance of semidefinite program.[5] The converse, however, is not valid: there are positive semidefinite cones that do not admit any second-order cone representation.[4]
Any closed convex semialgebraic set in the plane can be written as a feasible region of a SOCP,.[9] However, it is known that there exist convex semialgebraic sets of higher dimension that are not representable by SDPs; that is, there exist convex semialgebraic sets that can not be written as the feasible region of a SDP (nor, a fortiori, as the feasible region of a SOCP).[10]
Examples
[edit ]Quadratic constraint
[edit ]Consider a convex quadratic constraint of the form
- {\displaystyle x^{T}Ax+b^{T}x+c\leq 0.}
This is equivalent to the SOCP constraint
- {\displaystyle \lVert A^{1/2}x+{\frac {1}{2}}A^{-1/2}b\rVert \leq \left({\frac {1}{4}}b^{T}A^{-1}b-c\right)^{\frac {1}{2}}}
Stochastic linear programming
[edit ]Consider a stochastic linear program in inequality form
- minimize {\displaystyle \ c^{T}x\ }
- subject to
- {\displaystyle \mathbb {P} (a_{i}^{T}x\leq b_{i})\geq p,\quad i=1,\dots ,m}
where the parameters {\displaystyle a_{i}\ } are independent Gaussian random vectors with mean {\displaystyle {\bar {a}}_{i}} and covariance {\displaystyle \Sigma _{i}\ } and {\displaystyle p\geq 0.5}. This problem can be expressed as the SOCP
- minimize {\displaystyle \ c^{T}x\ }
- subject to
- {\displaystyle {\bar {a}}_{i}^{T}x+\Phi ^{-1}(p)\lVert \Sigma _{i}^{1/2}x\rVert _{2}\leq b_{i},\quad i=1,\dots ,m}
where {\displaystyle \Phi ^{-1}(\cdot )\ } is the inverse normal cumulative distribution function.[1]
Stochastic second-order cone programming
[edit ]We refer to second-order cone programs as deterministic second-order cone programs since data defining them are deterministic. Stochastic second-order cone programs are a class of optimization problems that are defined to handle uncertainty in data defining deterministic second-order cone programs.[11]
Other examples
[edit ]Other modeling examples are available at the MOSEK modeling cookbook.[12]
Solvers and scripting (programming) languages
[edit ]| Name | License | Brief info |
|---|---|---|
| ALGLIB | free/commercial | A dual-licensed C++/C#/Java/Python numerical analysis library with parallel SOCP solver. |
| AMPL | commercial | An algebraic modeling language with SOCP support |
| Artelys Knitro | commercial | |
| CPLEX | commercial | |
| FICO Xpress | commercial | |
| Gurobi Optimizer | commercial | |
| MATLAB | commercial | The coneprog function solves SOCP problems[13] using an interior-point algorithm[14]
|
| MOSEK | commercial | parallel interior-point algorithm |
| NAG Numerical Library | commercial | General purpose numerical library with SOCP solver |
See also
[edit ]- Power cones are generalizations of quadratic cones to powers other than 2.[15]
References
[edit ]- ^ a b Boyd, Stephen; Vandenberghe, Lieven (2004). Convex Optimization (PDF). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-83378-3 . Retrieved July 15, 2019.
- ^ Jibrin, Shafiu; Swift, James W. (2024). "On Second-Order Cone Functions". Journal of Optimization. 2024 (1) 7090058. doi:10.1155/2024/7090058 . ISSN 2314-6486.
- ^ Potra, lorian A.; Wright, Stephen J. (1 December 2000). "Interior-point methods". Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics. 124 (1–2): 281–302. Bibcode:2000JCoAM.124..281P. doi:10.1016/S0377-0427(00)00433-7.
- ^ a b Fawzi, Hamza (2019). "On representing the positive semidefinite cone using the second-order cone". Mathematical Programming. 175 (1–2): 109–118. arXiv:1610.04901 . doi:10.1007/s10107-018-1233-0. ISSN 0025-5610. S2CID 119324071.
- ^ a b c Lobo, Miguel Sousa; Vandenberghe, Lieven; Boyd, Stephen; Lebret, Hervé (1998). "Applications of second-order cone programming". Linear Algebra and Its Applications. 284 (1–3): 193–228. doi:10.1016/S0024-3795(98)10032-0 .
- ^ "Solving SOCP" (PDF).
- ^ "portfolio optimization" (PDF).
- ^ Li, Haksun (16 January 2022). Numerical Methods Using Java: For Data Science, Analysis, and Engineering. APress. pp. Chapter 10. ISBN 978-1-4842-6796-7.
- ^ Scheiderer, Claus (2020年04月08日). "Second-order cone representation for convex subsets of the plane". arXiv:2004.04196 [math.OC].
- ^ Scheiderer, Claus (2018). "Spectrahedral Shadows". SIAM Journal on Applied Algebra and Geometry. 2 (1): 26–44. doi:10.1137/17M1118981 . ISSN 2470-6566.
- ^ Alzalg, Baha M. (2012年10月01日). "Stochastic second-order cone programming: Applications models" . Applied Mathematical Modelling. 36 (10): 5122–5134. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2011年12月05日3. ISSN 0307-904X.
- ^ "MOSEK Modeling Cookbook - Conic Quadratic Optimization".
- ^ "Second-order cone programming solver - MATLAB coneprog". MathWorks. 2021年03月01日. Retrieved 2021年07月15日.
- ^ "Second-Order Cone Programming Algorithm - MATLAB & Simulink". MathWorks. 2021年03月01日. Retrieved 2021年07月15日.
- ^ "MOSEK Modeling Cookbook - the Power Cones".