Divisor
- Ænglisc
- العربية
- Aymar aru
- বাংলা
- 閩南語 / Bân-lâm-gí
- Беларуская
- Беларуская (тарашкевіца)
- Català
- Чӑвашла
- Čeština
- Dansk
- Ελληνικά
- Español
- Esperanto
- Euskara
- فارسی
- Français
- Galego
- ગુજરાતી
- 한국어
- Հայերեն
- हिन्दी
- Hrvatski
- Ido
- Bahasa Indonesia
- Íslenska
- Italiano
- עברית
- Қазақша
- Latviešu
- Lëtzebuergesch
- Magyar
- Македонски
- Malti
- मराठी
- Bahasa Melayu
- မြန်မာဘာသာ
- Na Vosa Vakaviti
- Nederlands
- 日本語
- Norsk nynorsk
- Oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча
- Polski
- Português
- Română
- Русский
- Simple English
- Slovenčina
- Slovenščina
- Ślůnski
- کوردی
- Српски / srpski
- Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски
- Suomi
- Svenska
- Tagalog
- தமிழ்
- తెలుగు
- ไทย
- Türkçe
- Українська
- Tiếng Việt
- 文言
- 吴语
- 粵語
- 中文
In mathematics, a divisor of an integer {\displaystyle n,} also called a factor of {\displaystyle n,} is an integer {\displaystyle m} that may be multiplied by some integer to produce {\displaystyle n.}[1] In this case, one also says that {\displaystyle n} is a multiple of {\displaystyle m.} An integer {\displaystyle n} is divisible or evenly divisible by another integer {\displaystyle m} if {\displaystyle m} is a divisor of {\displaystyle n}; this implies dividing {\displaystyle n} by {\displaystyle m} leaves no remainder.
Definition
[edit ]An integer {\displaystyle n} is divisible by a nonzero integer {\displaystyle m} if there exists an integer {\displaystyle k} such that {\displaystyle n=km.} This is written as
- {\displaystyle m\mid n.}
This may be read as that {\displaystyle m} divides {\displaystyle n,} {\displaystyle m} is a divisor of {\displaystyle n,} {\displaystyle m} is a factor of {\displaystyle n,} or {\displaystyle n} is a multiple of {\displaystyle m.} If {\displaystyle m} does not divide {\displaystyle n,} then the notation is {\displaystyle m\not \mid n.}[2] [3]
There are two conventions, distinguished by whether {\displaystyle m} is permitted to be zero:
- With the convention without an additional constraint on {\displaystyle m,} {\displaystyle m\mid 0} for every integer {\displaystyle m.}[2] [3]
- With the convention that {\displaystyle m} be nonzero, {\displaystyle m\mid 0} for every nonzero integer {\displaystyle m.}[4] [5]
General
[edit ]Divisors can be negative as well as positive, although often the term is restricted to positive divisors. For example, there are six divisors of 4; they are 1, 2, 4, −1, −2, and −4, but only the positive ones (1, 2, and 4) would usually be mentioned.
1 and −1 divide (are divisors of) every integer. Every integer (and its negation) is a divisor of itself. Integers divisible by 2 are called even, and integers not divisible by 2 are called odd.
1, −1, {\displaystyle n} and {\displaystyle -n} are known as the trivial divisors of {\displaystyle n.} A divisor of {\displaystyle n} that is not a trivial divisor is known as a non-trivial divisor (or strict divisor[6] ). A nonzero integer with at least one non-trivial divisor is known as a composite number, while the units −1 and 1 and prime numbers have no non-trivial divisors.
There are divisibility rules that allow one to recognize certain divisors of a number from the number's digits.
Examples
[edit ]- 7 is a divisor of 42 because {\displaystyle 7\times 6=42,} so we can say {\displaystyle 7\mid 42.} It can also be said that 42 is divisible by 7, 42 is a multiple of 7, 7 divides 42, or 7 is a factor of 42.
- The non-trivial divisors of 6 are 2, −2, 3, −3.
- The positive divisors of 42 are 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 14, 21, 42.
- The set of all positive divisors of 60, {\displaystyle A=\{1,2,3,4,5,6,10,12,15,20,30,60\},} partially ordered by divisibility, has the Hasse diagram:
Further notions and facts
[edit ]There are some elementary rules:
- If {\displaystyle a\mid b} and {\displaystyle b\mid c,} then {\displaystyle a\mid c;} that is, divisibility is a transitive relation.
- If {\displaystyle a\mid b} and {\displaystyle b\mid a,} then {\displaystyle a=b} or {\displaystyle a=-b.} (That is, {\displaystyle a} and {\displaystyle b} are associates.)
- If {\displaystyle a\mid b} and {\displaystyle a\mid c,} then {\displaystyle a\mid (b+c)} holds, as does {\displaystyle a\mid (b-c).}[a] However, if {\displaystyle a\mid b} and {\displaystyle c\mid b,} then {\displaystyle (a+c)\mid b} does not always hold (for example, {\displaystyle 2\mid 6} and {\displaystyle 3\mid 6} but 5 does not divide 6).
- {\displaystyle a\mid b\iff ac\mid bc} for nonzero {\displaystyle c}. This follows immediately from writing {\displaystyle ka=b\iff kac=bc}.
If {\displaystyle a\mid bc,} and {\displaystyle \gcd(a,b)=1,} then {\displaystyle a\mid c.}[b] This is called Euclid's lemma.
If {\displaystyle p} is a prime number and {\displaystyle p\mid ab} then {\displaystyle p\mid a} or {\displaystyle p\mid b.}
A positive divisor of {\displaystyle n} that is different from {\displaystyle n} is called a proper divisor or an aliquot part of {\displaystyle n} (for example, the proper divisors of 6 are 1, 2, and 3). A number that does not evenly divide {\displaystyle n} but leaves a remainder is sometimes called an aliquant part of {\displaystyle n.}
An integer {\displaystyle n>1} whose only proper divisor is 1 is called a prime number. Equivalently, a prime number is a positive integer that has exactly two positive factors: 1 and itself.
Any positive divisor of {\displaystyle n} is a product of prime divisors of {\displaystyle n} raised to some power. This is a consequence of the fundamental theorem of arithmetic.
A number {\displaystyle n} is said to be perfect if it equals the sum of its proper divisors, deficient if the sum of its proper divisors is less than {\displaystyle n,} and abundant if this sum exceeds {\displaystyle n.}
The total number of positive divisors of {\displaystyle n} is a multiplicative function {\displaystyle d(n),} meaning that when two numbers {\displaystyle m} and {\displaystyle n} are relatively prime, then {\displaystyle d(mn)=d(m)\times d(n).} For instance, {\displaystyle d(42)=8=2\times 2\times 2=d(2)\times d(3)\times d(7)}; the eight divisors of 42 are 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 14, 21 and 42. However, the number of positive divisors is not a totally multiplicative function: if the two numbers {\displaystyle m} and {\displaystyle n} share a common divisor, then it might not be true that {\displaystyle d(mn)=d(m)\times d(n).} The sum of the positive divisors of {\displaystyle n} is another multiplicative function {\displaystyle \sigma (n)} (for example, {\displaystyle \sigma (42)=96=3\times 4\times 8=\sigma (2)\times \sigma (3)\times \sigma (7)=1+2+3+6+7+14+21+42}). Both of these functions are examples of divisor functions.
If the prime factorization of {\displaystyle n} is given by
- {\displaystyle n=p_{1}^{\nu _{1}},円p_{2}^{\nu _{2}}\cdots p_{k}^{\nu _{k}}}
then the number of positive divisors of {\displaystyle n} is
- {\displaystyle d(n)=(\nu _{1}+1)(\nu _{2}+1)\cdots (\nu _{k}+1),}
and each of the divisors has the form
- {\displaystyle p_{1}^{\mu _{1}},円p_{2}^{\mu _{2}}\cdots p_{k}^{\mu _{k}}}
where {\displaystyle 0\leq \mu _{i}\leq \nu _{i}} for each {\displaystyle 1\leq i\leq k.}
For every natural {\displaystyle n,} {\displaystyle d(n)<2{\sqrt {n}}.}
Also,[7]
- {\displaystyle d(1)+d(2)+\cdots +d(n)=n\ln n+(2\gamma -1)n+O({\sqrt {n}}),}
where {\displaystyle \gamma } is Euler–Mascheroni constant. One interpretation of this result is that a randomly chosen positive integer n has an average number of divisors of about {\displaystyle \ln n.} However, this is a result from the contributions of numbers with "abnormally many" divisors.
In abstract algebra
[edit ]Ring theory
[edit ]Division lattice
[edit ]In definitions that allow the divisor to be 0, the relation of divisibility turns the set {\displaystyle \mathbb {N} } of non-negative integers into a partially ordered set that is a complete distributive lattice. The largest element of this lattice is 0 and the smallest is 1. The meet operation ∧ is given by the greatest common divisor and the join operation ∨ by the least common multiple. This lattice is isomorphic to the dual of the lattice of subgroups of the infinite cyclic group Z.
See also
[edit ]- Arithmetic functions
- Euclidean algorithm
- Fraction (mathematics)
- Integer factorization
- Table of divisors – A table of prime and non-prime divisors for 1–1000
- Table of prime factors – A table of prime factors for 1–1000
- Unitary divisor
Notes
[edit ]- ^ {\displaystyle a\mid b,,円a\mid c} {\displaystyle \Rightarrow \exists j\colon ja=b,,円\exists k\colon ka=c} {\displaystyle \Rightarrow \exists j,k\colon (j+k)a=b+c} {\displaystyle \Rightarrow a\mid (b+c).} Similarly, {\displaystyle a\mid b,,円a\mid c} {\displaystyle \Rightarrow \exists j\colon ja=b,,円\exists k\colon ka=c} {\displaystyle \Rightarrow \exists j,k\colon (j-k)a=b-c} {\displaystyle \Rightarrow a\mid (b-c).}
- ^ {\displaystyle \gcd } refers to the greatest common divisor.
Citations
[edit ]- ^ Tanton 2005, p. 185
- ^ a b Hardy & Wright 1960, p. 1
- ^ a b Niven, Zuckerman & Montgomery 1991, p. 4
- ^ Sims 1984, p. 42
- ^ Durbin (2009), p. 57, Chapter III Section 10
- ^ "FoCaLiZe and Dedukti to the Rescue for Proof Interoperability by Raphael Cauderlier and Catherine Dubois" (PDF).
- ^ Hardy & Wright 1960, p. 264, Theorem 320
References
[edit ]- Durbin, John R. (2009). Modern Algebra: An Introduction (6th ed.). New York: Wiley. ISBN 978-0470-38443-5.
- Guy, Richard K. (2004), Unsolved Problems in Number Theory (3rd ed.), Springer Verlag, ISBN 0-387-20860-7 ; section B
- Hardy, G. H.; Wright, E. M. (1960). An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
- Herstein, I. N. (1986), Abstract Algebra, New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, ISBN 0-02-353820-1
- Niven, Ivan; Zuckerman, Herbert S.; Montgomery, Hugh L. (1991). An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers (5th ed.). John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 0-471-62546-9.
- Øystein Ore, Number Theory and its History, McGraw–Hill, NY, 1944 (and Dover reprints).
- Sims, Charles C. (1984), Abstract Algebra: A Computational Approach, New York: John Wiley & Sons, ISBN 0-471-09846-9
- Tanton, James (2005). Encyclopedia of mathematics. New York: Facts on File. ISBN 0-8160-5124-0. OCLC 56057904.