Convergence in measure
Convergence in measure is either of two distinct mathematical concepts both of which generalize the concept of convergence in probability.
Definitions
[edit ]Let {\displaystyle f,f_{n}\ (n\in \mathbb {N} ):X\to \mathbb {R} } be measurable functions on a measure space {\displaystyle (X,\Sigma ,\mu ).} The sequence {\displaystyle f_{n}} is said to converge globally in measure to {\displaystyle f} if for every {\displaystyle \varepsilon >0,} {\displaystyle \lim _{n\to \infty }\mu (\{x\in X:|f(x)-f_{n}(x)|\geq \varepsilon \})=0,} and to converge locally in measure to {\displaystyle f} if for every {\displaystyle \varepsilon >0} and every {\displaystyle F\in \Sigma } with {\displaystyle \mu (F)<\infty ,} {\displaystyle \lim _{n\to \infty }\mu (\{x\in F:|f(x)-f_{n}(x)|\geq \varepsilon \})=0.}
On a finite measure space, both notions are equivalent. Otherwise, convergence in measure can refer to either global convergence in measure[1] : 2.2.3 or local convergence in measure, depending on the author.
Properties
[edit ]Throughout, {\displaystyle f} and {\displaystyle f_{n}} ({\displaystyle n\in \mathbb {N} }) are measurable functions {\displaystyle X\to \mathbb {R} }.
- Global convergence in measure implies local convergence in measure. The converse, however, is false; i.e., local convergence in measure is strictly weaker than global convergence in measure, in general.
- If, however, {\displaystyle \mu (X)<\infty } or, more generally, if {\displaystyle f} and all the {\displaystyle f_{n}} vanish outside some set of finite measure, then the distinction between local and global convergence in measure disappears.
- If {\displaystyle \mu } is σ-finite and (fn) converges (locally or globally) to {\displaystyle f} in measure, there is a subsequence converging to {\displaystyle f} almost everywhere.[1] : 2.2.5 The assumption of σ-finiteness is not necessary in the case of global convergence in measure.
- If {\displaystyle \mu } is {\displaystyle \sigma }-finite, {\displaystyle (f_{n})} converges to {\displaystyle f} locally in measure if and only if every subsequence has in turn a subsequence that converges to {\displaystyle f} almost everywhere.
- In particular, if {\displaystyle (f_{n})} converges to {\displaystyle f} almost everywhere, then {\displaystyle (f_{n})} converges to {\displaystyle f} locally in measure. The converse is false.
- Fatou's lemma and the monotone convergence theorem hold if almost everywhere convergence is replaced by (local or global) convergence in measure.
- If {\displaystyle \mu } is {\displaystyle \sigma }-finite, Lebesgue's dominated convergence theorem also holds if almost everywhere convergence is replaced by (local or global) convergence in measure.[1] : 2.8.6
- If {\displaystyle X=[a,b]\subseteq \mathbb {R} } and μ is Lebesgue measure, there are sequences {\displaystyle (g_{n})} of step functions and {\displaystyle (h_{n})} of continuous functions converging globally in measure to {\displaystyle f}.
- If {\displaystyle f} and {\displaystyle f_{n}} are in Lp(μ) for some {\displaystyle p>0} and {\displaystyle (f_{n})} converges to {\displaystyle f} in the {\displaystyle p}-norm, then {\displaystyle (f_{n})} converges to {\displaystyle f} globally in measure. The converse is false.
- If {\displaystyle f_{n}} converges to {\displaystyle f} in measure and {\displaystyle g_{n}} converges to {\displaystyle g} in measure then {\displaystyle f_{n}+g_{n}} converges to {\displaystyle f+g} in measure. Additionally, if the measure space is finite, {\displaystyle f_{n}g_{n}} also converges to {\displaystyle fg}.
Counterexamples
[edit ]Let {\displaystyle X=\mathbb {R} }, {\displaystyle \mu } be Lebesgue measure, and {\displaystyle f} the constant function with value zero.
- The sequence {\displaystyle f_{n}=\chi _{[n,\infty )}} converges to {\displaystyle f} locally in measure, but does not converge to {\displaystyle f} globally in measure.
- The sequence
- {\displaystyle f_{n}=\chi _{\left[{\frac {j}{2^{k}}},{\frac {j+1}{2^{k}}}\right]},}
- where {\displaystyle k=\lfloor \log _{2}n\rfloor } and {\displaystyle j=n-2^{k}}, the first five terms of which are
- {\displaystyle \chi _{\left[0,1\right]},\;\chi _{\left[0,{\frac {1}{2}}\right]},\;\chi _{\left[{\frac {1}{2}},1\right]},\;\chi _{\left[0,{\frac {1}{4}}\right]},\;\chi _{\left[{\frac {1}{4}},{\frac {1}{2}}\right]},}
- converges to {\displaystyle 0} globally in measure; but for no {\displaystyle x} does {\displaystyle f_{n}(x)} converge to zero. Hence {\displaystyle (f_{n})} fails to converge to {\displaystyle f} almost everywhere.[1] : 2.2.4
- The sequence
- {\displaystyle f_{n}=n\chi _{\left[0,{\frac {1}{n}}\right]}}
- converges to {\displaystyle f} almost everywhere and globally in measure, but not in the {\displaystyle p}-norm for any {\displaystyle p\geq 1}.
Topology
[edit ]There is a topology, called the topology of (local) convergence in measure, on the collection of measurable functions from X such that local convergence in measure corresponds to convergence on that topology. This topology is defined by the family of pseudometrics {\displaystyle \{\rho _{F}:F\in \Sigma ,\ \mu (F)<\infty \},} where {\displaystyle \rho _{F}(f,g)=\int _{F}\min\{|f-g|,1\},円d\mu .} In general, one may restrict oneself to some subfamily of sets F (instead of all possible subsets of finite measure). It suffices that for each {\displaystyle G\subset X} of finite measure and {\displaystyle \varepsilon >0} there exists F in the family such that {\displaystyle \mu (G\setminus F)<\varepsilon .} When {\displaystyle \mu (X)<\infty }, we may consider only one metric {\displaystyle \rho _{X}}, so the topology of convergence in finite measure is metrizable. If {\displaystyle \mu } is an arbitrary measure finite or not, then {\displaystyle d(f,g):=\inf \limits _{\delta >0}\mu (\{|f-g|\geq \delta \})+\delta } still defines a metric that generates the global convergence in measure.[2]
Because this topology is generated by a family of pseudometrics, it is uniformizable. Working with uniform structures instead of topologies allows us to formulate uniform properties such as Cauchyness.
See also
[edit ]References
[edit ]- D.H. Fremlin, 2000. Measure Theory . Torres Fremlin.
- H.L. Royden, 1988. Real Analysis. Prentice Hall.
- G. B. Folland 1999, Section 2.4. Real Analysis. John Wiley & Sons.