Minimum Scalar Product

Question

Minimum Scalar Product

The inspiration for this code golf problem is from Google's code jam competition. The premise behind the problem is, given the input of two vectors of varying lengths, find the minimum possible scalar. A scalar can be found using the following formula:

x1 * y1 + x2 * y2 + ... + xn * yn

The problem, however, is that multiple values for the scalar can be found depending on the order of the numerals in the input case (seen below). Your goal is to determine the minimum possible scalar integer solution by plugging in the input case numbers into the equation and solving for it. You may use every number in the input only once, and must use all of the numbers.

Allow me to provide an example with the following vectors.

Input

3
1 3 -5
-2 4 1

Output

-25

The first integer on the line represents the number of numbers, n, in each vector. In this case, we have three numbers in each vector.

The number n may vary with each test case, but there will always be two vectors.

In the example input, the minimum scalar product would be -25.

(-5 * 4) + (1 * 1) + (3 * -2) = 25

Rules

• You may only use each integer in both vectors once.
• You must use all integers in the vectors.
• Your output must only include the final product
• I'll select the solution with the least amount of code, which follows all of the specifications listed above, in any language!

Hint: You don't need to brute force this problem, unless it makes your code shorter. There is a specific method involved in finding the minimum spanning scalar :).

• proud haskeller: I really don't want to spoil for anybody, so don't open this unless you already know the answer. this is so well-known it's funny. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rearrangement_inequality

Answer 1

Jelly, 6 bytes

×ばつṢ}S

Try it online!

Using brute force is equally short:

×ばつS€Ṃ

How it works

×ばつṢ}S Main link. Arguments: u (vector), v (vector)
Ṣ Sort the components of u.
 Ṛ Reverse.
 Ṣ} Sort the components of v.
 ×ばつ Multiply the results, element by element.
 S Compute the sum of the products.

Answer 2

Seriously, 6 bytes

,SR,S*

Try it online!

Explanation:

,SR,S*
,SR input first vector, sort, reverse
 ,S input second vector, sort
 * dot product

Answer 3

APL, 15 bytes

×ばつ⍵[⍋⍵]}

This is a dyadic function that accepts arrays on the left and right and returns an integer. It uses the same approach as my Julia answer: dot product of the sorted arrays, one descending and one ascending.

Try it here

Answer 4

MATL, 6 bytes

Code:

SiSP*s

My first MATL answer :)

Explanation:

S # Sort the first array
 iS # Take the second array and sort it
 P # Flip the array
 * # Multiply both arrays with each other
 s # Sum of the result

Try it online!

• Luis Mendo: I'm glad to see this! :-)

Answer 5

Mathematica, (削除) 30 (削除ここまで) 17 bytes

-13 bytes by murphy

Sort@#.-Sort@-#2&

Function, input is vector1(list),vector2(list) Several revisions:

Plus@@(Sort@#*Reverse@Sort@#2)&(*me*)
Total[Sort@#*Reverse@Sort@#2]& 
Sort@#.Reverse@Sort@#2& (*alephalpha*)
Sort@#.Sort[#2,#>#2&]& (*murphy*)
Sort@#.SortBy[#2,-#&] (*me*)
Sort@#.-Sort@-#2& (*murphy*)

• baseman101: clever solution!
• alephalpha: Sort@#.Reverse@Sort@#2&
• murphy: Sort@#.Sort[#2,#>#2&]&
• murphy: Sort@#.-Sort@-#2&
• CalculatorFeline: Or for your solution 1, Sort@#.SortBy[#2,-#&]

Answer 6

Julia, (削除) 32 (削除ここまで) 25 bytes

x->y->-sort(-x)⋅sort(y)

This is an anonymous function that accepts two arrays and returns an integer. To call it, assign it to a variable and do f(x)(y).

For inputs x and y, we simply compute the dot product of x sorted in reverse order with y sorted. We get x in reverse sorted order by negating all values, sorting, then negating again.

Saved 7 bytes thanks to Dennis!

Answer 7

Pyth - (削除) 14 (削除ここまで) 8 bytes

I think I figured out the trick.

s*VSQ_SE

Try it online here.

Answer 8

Javascript ES6, 69 bytes

a=>b=>a.sort((x,y)=>x-y).map((x,y)=>i+=b.sort((x,y)=>y-x)[y]*x,i=0)|i

Wow, this is way too long.

• Neil: I think trying to reuse the sort function is costing you 3 bytes.
• Mama Fun Roll: I did more golfing. Better?
• ETHproductions: You can probably save a byte with |i instead of &&i
• Mama Fun Roll: Thx @ETHproductions
• Neil: Yes, that's what I was thinking of.

Answer 9

Perl 6, (削除) 33 (削除ここまで) 30 bytes

{sum @^a.sort Z*@^b.sort.reverse}

• Aleks-Daniel Jakimenko-A.: Why not {sum @^a.sort Z*[R,] @^b.sort}((1,3,-5),(-2,4,1)).say

Answer 10

CJam, 11 Bytes

q~$\$W%.*:+

Try it online!

Answer 11

C++, 124 bytes

#include<algorithm>
int m(int*a,int*b,int n){std::sort(a,a+n);std::sort(b,b+n);int r=0;while(--n>=0)r+=a[n]**b++;return r;}

ungolfed:

#include<algorithm>
int m(int*a,int*b,int n){
 std::sort(a,a+n);
 std::sort(b,b+n);
 int r=0;
 while(--n>=0)
 r+=a[n]*(*b++);
return r;
}

At first i used std::greater<int>() for the sort in b but just reversing the order in the summation is easier.

Answer 12

Haskell, 59 bytes

import Data.List
v?u=sum$zipWith(*)(sort v)$reverse$sort u

Answer 13

Python 3, 136 bytes

def mdp(n, a, b):
 a = list(reversed(sorted(a)))
 b = sorted(b)
 res = sum([a[i] * b[i] for i in range(len(a))])
 return res

Try it online!

• charredgrass: You can save a few bytes by removing spaces next to equals, for instance b = sorted(b) turns into b=sorted(b) (2 bytes saved). You can additionally put multiple statements on the same line by separating them with a semicolon, for instance a=list(reversed(sorted(a)));b=sorted(b);res=0
• rebelliard: @charredgrass I'm new here. What's the need to save every possible byte? I was trying to make it readable.
• charredgrass: Welcome to PPCG then! This question is a code-golf competition where the goal is to write code to complete the challenge in the fewest bytes possible, which usually means less readable code.
• rebelliard: @charredgrass got it!
• user45941: Much shorter: lambda a,b,s=sorted:sum(x*y for x,y in zip(s(a)[::-1],s(b))). We don't require function submissions to be named (so an unnamed lambda is valid), and the n parameter is unnecessary (many other submissions omit it entirely).

Answer 14

RETURN, 29 bytes

×ばつ␌]#}␁[¤][+]#]

Try it here.

Replace any ␆␃␄␇ with their unprintable counterparts.

Anonymous lambda that leaves result on stack2. Usage:

""{1 3 0 5-}""{0 2- 4 ×ばつ␌]#}␁[¤][+]#]!

Explanation

[ ] lambda
 {␆␃} sort and reverse first stack
 \{␆} sort second stack
 ␄␅ transpose and flatten
 [ ][ ]# while loop
 ¤\ check if 2 items exist in stack
 ×ばつ if so, multiply top 2 items
 ␌ and push to stack2
 }␁ switch to stack2
 [¤][+]# sum stack2

Answer 15

J, 14 bytes

+/@(*|.)&(/:~)

Uses the same principle as the others.

Explanation

+/@(*|.)&(/:~) Input: x on LHS and y on RHS
 &(/:~) Sort both x and y
 |. Reverse the sorted y
 * Multiply the sorted x and reversed sorted y elementwise
+/@ Reduce the products using addition and return

Answer 16

Ruby, 44 bytes

->a,b{a.sort.reverse.zip(b.sort).sum{_1*_2}}

Attempt This Online!

Answer 17

Japt -x, 6 bytes

Íí*VÍÔ

Try it

Answer 18

Uiua, 9 bytes

×ばつ⇌∩⊏∩⊸⍏

Try it!

×ばつ⇌∩⊏∩⊸⍏
 ⊏ ⊸⍏ # sort
 ∩ ∩ # both
 ⇌ # reverse one
 ×ばつ # multiply
/+ # sum

Answer 19

JavaScript (Node.js), 62 bytes

a=>a.map(x=>x.sort((x,y)=>x-y))[i=0].map(x=>i+=a[1].pop()*x)|i

Try it online!

Based on Mama Fun Roll's

-4B by Shaggy by switching Input format

• Shaggy: 62 bytes with a 2D-array.

Answer 20

Scala 3, 76 bytes

(x,y)=>x.sorted(Ordering[Int].reverse).zip(y.sorted).map{case(a,b)=>a*b}.sum

Attempt This Online!