Given a list with number, output the ranges like this:
Input: [0, 5, 0] would become [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0].
This is mapping a range through the array, so we first have to create the range [0, 5], which is [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. After that, we use the 5 to create the range [5, 0]. Appended at our previous range, this gives us:
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0]
Let's observe a test case with two same digits next to each other:
[3, 5, 5, 3], ranges:
[3, 5] = 3, 4, 5
[5, 5] = 5 (actually [5, 5] due to overlapping)
[5, 3] = 5, 4, 3
So this would give us [3, 4, 5, 5, 4, 3].
Some other test cases:
[1, 9] > [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
[10, -10] > [10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0, -1, -2, -3, -4, -5, -6, -7, -8, -9, -10]
[3, 0, 0, -3] > [3, 2, 1, 0, 0, -1, -2, -3]
[1, 3, 5, 7, 5, 3, 1, -1, -3] > [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0, -1, -2, -3]
Input will always have at least 2 integers.
Shortest answer wins!
-
3\$\begingroup\$ Related. Related. \$\endgroup\$Martin Ender– Martin Ender2016年03月05日 14:22:18 +00:00Commented Mar 5, 2016 at 14:22
-
1\$\begingroup\$ In what way are input and output related? What constitutes a valid input? \$\endgroup\$flawr– flawr2016年03月05日 14:31:29 +00:00Commented Mar 5, 2016 at 14:31
20 Answers 20
-
21\$\begingroup\$ Do you have a dictionary of all built-ins in all esolangs in your head, or what? ;) \$\endgroup\$ETHproductions– ETHproductions2016年03月05日 17:51:12 +00:00Commented Mar 5, 2016 at 17:51
-
10\$\begingroup\$ Why does it even have a built-in for this? \$\endgroup\$Neil– Neil2016年03月05日 20:24:19 +00:00Commented Mar 5, 2016 at 20:24
-
\$\begingroup\$ There should be a compilation of all 0byte and 1byte (maybe even 2byte) programs that do stuff. \$\endgroup\$CalculatorFeline– CalculatorFeline2016年03月06日 15:56:45 +00:00Commented Mar 6, 2016 at 15:56
-
3\$\begingroup\$ @Neil It's basically an inclusive range function, it's really not that spectacular. \$\endgroup\$Adnan– Adnan2016年03月06日 19:53:59 +00:00Commented Mar 6, 2016 at 19:53
-
\$\begingroup\$ I challenge you with this question: codegolf.stackexchange.com/questions/240385/… :-) \$\endgroup\$TarmoPikaro– TarmoPikaro2021年12月31日 09:31:31 +00:00Commented Dec 31, 2021 at 9:31
Javascript, (削除) 99 (削除ここまで) (削除) 95 (削除ここまで) 93 bytes
(削除) 4 (削除ここまで) 6 bytes off thanks @Neil.
a=>a.reduce((x,y)=>x.concat(b.map?b=y:[...Array(y<b?b-y:y-b||1)].map(_=>b+=y<b?-1:y>b)),b=[])
f=
a=>a.reduce(
(x,y)=>
x.concat(
b.map?b=y
:[...Array(y<b?b-y:y-b||1)]
.map(_=>b+=y<b?-1:y>b)
)
,b=[])
G.addEventListener('click',_=>O.innerHTML=f(JSON.parse(I.value)));
<input id=I value="[3,5,5,3]"><button id=G>Go</button><pre id=O>
-
1\$\begingroup\$ Save 3 bytes by using
y<b?b-y:y-b||1. Save another byte by usingy>b||y-b&&-1. \$\endgroup\$Neil– Neil2016年03月05日 20:15:23 +00:00Commented Mar 5, 2016 at 20:15 -
\$\begingroup\$ @Neil. Good ones!! Thanks :) \$\endgroup\$removed– removed2016年03月05日 20:24:01 +00:00Commented Mar 5, 2016 at 20:24
-
1\$\begingroup\$ Actually
y<b?-1:y>bis better still. \$\endgroup\$Neil– Neil2016年03月05日 23:45:31 +00:00Commented Mar 5, 2016 at 23:45
JavaScript (SpiderMonkey 30+), (削除) 81 (削除ここまで) 76 bytes
([n,...a])=>[n,...[for(i of a)for(j of Array(i<n?n-i:i-n||1))n+=i<n?-1:i>n]]
Tested in Firefox 44. Uses ES6's awesome argument destructuring capabilities and ES7's array comprehensions (which have sadly been removed from the ES7 spec).
-
\$\begingroup\$ Doesn't work on
[3, 0, 0, -3]. I fixed the RangeError and saved 10 bytes but it still doesn't work:([n,...a],z=[n])=>z.concat([for(i of a)for(j of[...Array((r=n<i)?i-n-1:n-i-1),0])i=r?++n:--n])\$\endgroup\$Neil– Neil2016年03月05日 20:09:03 +00:00Commented Mar 5, 2016 at 20:09 -
\$\begingroup\$ Sorry, I meant
([n,...a])=>[n].concat([for(i of a)for(j of[...Array((r=n<i)?i-n:n-i)])i=r?++n:--n])of course. \$\endgroup\$Neil– Neil2016年03月05日 20:26:11 +00:00Commented Mar 5, 2016 at 20:26 -
\$\begingroup\$ @Neil Fixed, with a bunch more golfed off in the process \$\endgroup\$ETHproductions– ETHproductions2016年03月06日 01:27:30 +00:00Commented Mar 6, 2016 at 1:27
JavaScript (ES6) 66 (削除) 72 (削除ここまで)
A recursive function that repeatedly adds values inside the array to fill the gaps between near numbers
f=l=>l.some((x,i)=>(z=l[i-1]-x)*z>1&&l.splice(i,0,x+z/2|0))?f(l):l
Test
f=l=>l.some((x,i)=>(z=l[i-1]-x)*z>1&&l.splice(i,0,x+z/2|0))?f(l):l
console.log=x=>O.textContent+=x+'\n'
;[[1,9],[10,-10],[3,0,0,-3],[1, 3, 5, 7, 5, 3, 1, -1, -3]]
.forEach(t=>console.log(t+' -> ' +f(t)))
<pre id=O></pre>
C, 120 + 12 = 132 bytes
i,j,k;f(a,n)int*a;{a[0]--;for(i=0;i<n-1;i++)for(k=0,j=a[i]-a[i+1]?a[i]:a[i]-1;j-a[i+1];)printf("%i ",j+=a[i+1]>j?1:-1);}
Example call:
f(a,sizeof(a)/4); // I've added 12 bytes because of ",sizeof(a)/4"
Test live on ideone.
Python 2, 77 bytes
lambda n:n[0:1]+sum([range(x,y,2*(y>x)-1)[1:]+[y]for(x,y)in zip(n,n[1:])],[])
Thanks to Neil, DenkerAffe, and Erwan for pointing out improvements that I missed
-
\$\begingroup\$ Surely the
+1is unnecessary? \$\endgroup\$Neil– Neil2016年03月05日 20:21:06 +00:00Commented Mar 5, 2016 at 20:21 -
\$\begingroup\$ why not go with
lambda n:n[0:1]+sum([range(x,y,[1,-1][y+1<x])[1:]+[y]for(x,y)in zip(n,n[1:])],[])? saves some bytes. \$\endgroup\$Denker– Denker2016年03月05日 22:46:46 +00:00Commented Mar 5, 2016 at 22:46 -
\$\begingroup\$ I was very tired while writing this :) Answer first, improve later. \$\endgroup\$user45941– user459412016年03月05日 23:43:20 +00:00Commented Mar 5, 2016 at 23:43
-
\$\begingroup\$ i think you can replace
[1,-1][y+1<x]by2*(y>x)-1(also i don't understand why you usey<=xand not simplyy<x) \$\endgroup\$Erwan– Erwan2016年03月09日 09:04:01 +00:00Commented Mar 9, 2016 at 9:04 -
\$\begingroup\$
n[0:1]is equivalent ton[:1]. \$\endgroup\$Jonathan Frech– Jonathan Frech2017年10月07日 16:18:59 +00:00Commented Oct 7, 2017 at 16:18
Perl, 47 bytes
Includes +3 for -p (code contains $' so space and - count too)
Give the list of numbers on STDIN:
fluctuating.pl <<< "3 5 5 3"
fluctuating.pl:
#!/usr/bin/perl -p
($n=$&+($'<=>$&))-$'&&s/\G/$n / while/\S+ /g
The temporary variable and all these parenthesis feel suboptimal...
-
\$\begingroup\$ It looks like you posted the wrong answer : it doesn't seem to be working and that
$'you mentioned isn't in the code... \$\endgroup\$Dada– Dada2016年09月07日 20:33:08 +00:00Commented Sep 7, 2016 at 20:33 -
\$\begingroup\$ @Dada: Yes, again pasted an old untested version of the code instead of the fixed one. Thanks and fixed \$\endgroup\$Ton Hospel– Ton Hospel2016年09月07日 22:47:43 +00:00Commented Sep 7, 2016 at 22:47
Haskell, (削除) 63 (削除ここまで) 55 bytes
g(a:b:r)=[a|a==b]++[a..b-1]++[a,a-1..b+1]++g(b:r)
g x=x
Usage example: g [3,5,5,3] -> [3,4,5,5,4,3].
It's a modification of my answer to a related challenge. Again, the main work is done by concatenating the list from a upwards to b-1 and from a downwards to b+1 (where one list will be empty) and a recursive call. To handle the a==b case where both lists are empty, we prepend [a|a==b] which evaluates to [a] if a==b and [] otherwise.
R, (削除) 86 (削除ここまで) (削除) 82 (削除ここまで) 75 bytes
function(x)rep((y<-rle(unlist(Map(seq,head(x,-1),x[-1]))))$v,pmax(1,y$l-1))
saved 4 bytes using rep not rep.int (code golf not performance!)
saved another 7 bytes by using built-in partial matching when using $ (and collapsing function definition to 1 line
-
\$\begingroup\$ I think
(y=...)rather than(y<-...)is also valid, and one byte less. \$\endgroup\$Giuseppe– Giuseppe2017年10月06日 14:51:57 +00:00Commented Oct 6, 2017 at 14:51
Ruby, (削除) 116 (削除ここまで) 82 bytes
->n{o,*m=n;o=[o];m.zip(n).map{|t,u|o+=[[u],[*u+1..t],[*t..u-1].reverse][t<=>u]};o}
My first ever golf.
Edit: Thanks manatwork for the awesome suggestions.
-
\$\begingroup\$ No need to assign to variable, anonymous proc is enough; no need to put parenthesis around formal parameter; taking out the array's first element is shorter with parallel assignment and splat;
map's code block can take the array as multiple parameters:->n{o,*m=n;o=[o];m.zip(n).map{|t,u|o+=u==t ?[u]:(u<t ?[*u+1..t]:[*t..u-1].reverse)};o}. Otherwise nice first golf. \$\endgroup\$manatwork– manatwork2016年03月08日 07:17:15 +00:00Commented Mar 8, 2016 at 7:17 -
\$\begingroup\$ Picking from a 3 element array by spaceship operator is shorter than 2 ternary operators:
[[u],[*u+1..t],[*t..u-1].reverse][t<=>u]. \$\endgroup\$manatwork– manatwork2016年03月08日 07:40:05 +00:00Commented Mar 8, 2016 at 7:40
Perl 6, 94 bytes
I'm not super happy with this right now, I'll probably take another shot later
{reduce {|@^a[0..*-2],|@^b},map {@_[0]!= @_[1]??(@_[0]...@_[1])!!(@_[0],@_[1])},.rotor(2=>-1)}
PHP 5.4, 86 bytes
This is meant to be used as an included file, that returns the result.
The values are passed as commandline parameters.
<?for($i=1;$i<$argc-1;$R=array_merge($R?:[],range($argv[$i++],$argv[$i++])));return$R;
Not exactly pretty or anything, but does the job.
Python 3, 76 bytes
First attempt at a Python answer. The basic idea is to repeatedly identify pairs in the sequence where the difference is larger than a step and insert one (and only one) additional element to complete the sequence in the right direction. Repeat until all differences between consecutive elements are between +1 and -1.
d=diff
while any(d(x)**2>1):i=argmax(d(x)**2);x[:i+1]+=[x[i]+sign(d(x)[i])]
Lua, 156 Bytes
A function that takes an array in parameter and return the extended array.
function f(t)r={}for i=2,#t
do x,y=t[i-1],t[i]r[#r+1]=x==y and x or nil
z=x>y and-1or 1
x=x==r[#r]and x+z or x
for j=x,y,z
do r[#r+1]=j end end
return r end
Ungolfed and explanations
function f(t)
r={} -- Initialise an empty array
for i=2,#t -- Iterate over the parameter array
do
x,y=t[i-1],t[i] -- x and y are shorter names than t[i-1]
r[#r+1]= -- when there's a range like [5,5]
x==y and x or nil -- put this number once in the array
z=x>y and-1or 1 -- determine the step value
x= x==r[#r] -- prevent repeating the last value of r
and x+z or x -- by incrementing/decrementing x
for j=x,y,z -- iterate from t[i-1] to t[i] by step z (-1 or 1)
do
r[#r+1]=j -- put j into the array r
end
end
return r -- return the extended array
end
For ease of use, you can use the following function to print the array returned by f().
function printArray(t)
print("["..table.concat(t,",").."]")
end
When testing this submission, you can call it like:
printArray(f( {0,5,0,3,4,4,7,3,-3} ))
> [0,1,2,3,4,5,4,3,2,1,0,1,2,3,4,4,5,6,7,6,5,4,3,2,1,0,-1,-2,-3]
Mathcad, 62 "bytes"
As Mathcad uses a 2D "whiteboard" and special operators (eg, summation operator, integral operator), and saves in an XML format, an actual worksheet may contain several hundred (or more) characters. For the purposes of Code Golf, I've taken a Mathcad "byte count" to be the number of characters or operators that the user must enter to create the worksheet.
Converting the function definition to a straight program, and replacing the variable lst with a single character name, gives a total of 62 "bytes". With the function, using a single character rather than the full name, this increases to 65 "bytes" for the definition and a further 4 "bytes" for each call (assuming that creation of the list itself isn't included in the overall byte count (Using Mathcad's built-in tables is another way of inputting the list).
PHP, 144 bytes
function f($r){$m=[];for($i=0;++$i<count($r);){$d=array_pop($m);$n=$r[$i];$p=$r[$i-1];$m=array_merge($m,$p==$n?[$p,$n]:range($p,$n));}return$m;}
Exploded view
function f($r) {
$m = [];
for ($i=0; ++$i < count($r); ) {
$d = array_pop($m);
$n = $r[$i];
$p = $r[$i-1];
$m = array_merge($m, $p==$n ? [$p,$n]
: range($p,$n));
}
return $m;
}
Input / function call
f([ bound1, bound2, bound3, ... ]);
Output
[int, int, int, int, ...]
It's messy and chunky, and I'll try to optimize it later. It creates a range() from each pair of adjacent value pairs, then stitches them together (after poping off the end of the previous cumulative Array).
Perl6, 21
.join is short for $_.join
say EVAL .join: "..."
Test (rakudo)
perl6 -MMONKEY-SEE-NO-EVAL -e'say EVAL @*ARGS.join: "..."' 1 3 5 7 5 3 1 -1 -3
Output
(1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 -3)
R, 74 bytes
Another R solution
function(x){b=x[1];z=c();for(a in x[-1]){z=c(z,c(b:(a-sign(a-b))));b=a};z}
-
\$\begingroup\$ this doesn't quite work as the last value seems to be missing... \$\endgroup\$Giuseppe– Giuseppe2018年05月17日 20:19:48 +00:00Commented May 17, 2018 at 20:19