To: | "'[ontolog-forum] '" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | "Rich Cooper" <metasemantics@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | 2015年5月27日 13:08:53 -0700 |
Message-id: | <0beb01d098b8$f4800760$dd801620$@com > |
Just the published patents take up about a TB of space at the USPTO, so stacking up about seven or eight of those FMF units could be partitioned by vocabulary perhaps. But the search parts would then have to be over the entire vocabulary and any unit that has a partial match with the patent vocabularies.
What would the total cost of ownership (TCO) be like to set up a project with the FMF performing the needed functionalities, plus a few dbmss?
Sincerely,
Rich Cooper,
Rich Cooper,
Chief Technology Officer,
MetaSemantics Corporation
MetaSemantics AT EnglishLogicKernel DOT com
( 9 4 9 ) 5 2 5-5 7 1 2
http://www.EnglishLogicKernel.com
-----Original Message-----
From: ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John F Sowa
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 12:53 PM
To: ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] Architecture of Intelligent Systems - Flexible
Modular Framework
Rich,
First a correction. In the following I meant to say 14 gigabytes, not 14 terabytes. It actually did a significant amount of processing.
> As for performance, the space overhead for one agent is about 1K bytes
> (plus whatever space the application uses). In one test, the FMF used
> thousands of agents to process 14 gigabytes of data on a machine with
> 8 CPUs in 15 minutes. When 7 CPUs were turned off, it took almost
> 2 hours. That's almost linear scaling. (The data was provided by the
> client, and the VivoMind system generated better results in less time
> than the previous software that the client had been using.)
JFS
> However, most AI systems for NLP and informal reasoning make do with
> any data they get.
RC
> Agreed - there are many data wrangling tools. Embedding one or more
> dbmss makes great sense also, even very local dbmss that are only
> shared among a LAN's users for security reasons.
Yes, our clients are professionals who know how to handle large volumes of data with all the required locking, etc. What they need are methods for processing and interpreting large volumes. They don't need or want the system to update the old data.
John
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
_________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (01)
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Architecture of Intelligent Systems - Flexible Modular Framework , John F Sowa |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Architecture of Intelligent Systems - Flexible Modular Framework , Thomas Johnston |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Architecture of Intelligent Systems - Flexible Modular Framework , John F Sowa |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Architecture of Intelligent Systems - Flexible Modular Framework , Michael Brunnbauer |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |