To: | "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | David Eddy <deddy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | 2011年4月21日 16:57:32 -0400 |
Message-id: | <52DFA1E7-00AA-422D-9C29-B538565D5513@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Jack - (01) On 2011年04月21日, at 4:43 PM, Jack Park wrote: (02) > (setting aside the simplistic notion that one URI satisfies all > users)? (03) I offer... in 1980 I worked at a life insurance company renowned for it's data management efforts (this is NOT 'data management' in context of disks & storage). (04) They had found 70 different labels/names for the core business concept "policy number." The one I still remember was M0101... an excellent Fortran name. (05) Would that be an issue with the URI approach? (06) ___________________ David Eddy deddy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (07) _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (08)
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Relating and Reconciling Ontologies , Jack Park |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Relating and Reconciling Ontologies , Jack Park |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Relating and Reconciling Ontologies , Jack Park |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Relating and Reconciling Ontologies , Jack Park |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |