ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] new logic

To: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Christopher Menzel <cmenzel@xxxxxxxx>
Date: 2010年1月19日 17:38:04 -0600
Message-id: <1263944284.5096.27.camel@new-philebus >
On Tue, 2010年01月19日 at 13:36 -0500, Patrick Cassidy wrote:
> John,
> Re: Describing a computation with FOL
> Can FOL actually *perform* arithmetic functions?  (01) 
That's like asking whether English can dance the tango. FOL doesn't
*do* anything. FOL is a language, a semantics and (typically) a system
by means of which an agent can generate proofs. Thus, FOL can be *used*
to represent information and demonstrate, e.g., when one thing follows
from another. You can therefore *describe* a computation in FOL and
prove things about that computation. But FOL of itself doesn't do
anything at all.  (02)
> I know that one can assert that there is a function that takes two
> numbers and associates with them their sum, but it seems that to use
> such a function in FOL one needs to have a preexisting table of such
> sums, impractical in the general case. Is there a way for FOL
> reasoning to actually **compute** a sum (or difference, product,
> ratio) as a Turing machine could?  (03) 
Well, now you've changed the subject from FOL to FOL *reasoning*. And,
under one reasonable interpretation of "FOL reasoning", the answer is
"yes". For a given Turing machine M halts on input n if and only if
there is a corresponding proof in first-order logic that in a precise
sense represents M's computation.* Hence, by means of first-order
reasoning one can compute a sum, difference, product, ratio etc just as
a Turing machine could -- however, typically it would be a lot quicker
and easier just to perform a simple arithmetic proof directly using,
say, Peano Arithmetic.  (04)
Chris Menzel  (05)
*This is in fact how one shows that the undecidability of first-order
logical implication follows from the halting problem. For details, see
Boolos, Burgess, and Jeffrey, Computability and Logic, ch 11.  (06)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ 
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ 
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  (07)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: [ontolog-forum] CFP: Workshop Proposals for EKAW 2010] , Nathalie Aussenac-Gilles
Next by Date: Re: [ontolog-forum] new logic , Christopher Menzel
Previous by Thread: Re: [ontolog-forum] new logic , Patrick Cassidy
Next by Thread: Re: [ontolog-forum] new logic , Adrian Walker
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /