On Feb 5, 2009, at 7:52 AM, Александр Шкотин wrote:

[Az]

Re. the universe of discourse, the point is not giving a comprehesive definition, but to emphasize that this hybrid construct has two faces: "universe" and "discourse." This semantic duality is the source of confusion even for experienced minds. But if you view the issue as simple, make your contribution, try and extend the Wikipedia article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universe_of_discourse. Good luck.

<Al> actually I am happy with this one http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/universe%20of%20discourse

Me too.

Look at the Date: 1881. It is clear that Wikipedian should cite the inventor.

Probably Charles Saunders Pierce, given the date and the fact that whoever wrote it was writing in English rather than German. Also the choice of the word "discourse" has a Piercian ring to it.

BTW, Googling "domain of discourse" and C. S. Pierce located this gem:

www.socialscience.t-mobile.hu/vol2_pietarinen.pdf

which all the SWeb-bashers out there should read :-)

Pat

------------------------------------------------------------

IHMC (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973

40 South Alcaniz St. (850)202 4416 office

Pensacola (850)202 4440 fax

FL 32502 (850)291 0667 mobile

phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes

_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx