There is a CMAP plug in for Protege, it is map2owl. It does not translate, but instead it uses OWL constructs to represent the CMAP.
Having the cmap plug in into the protege environment makes it a lot easier for the "capture" and "formalization" processes to be easily integrated. the cmap interface is very similar to the one provided by CMAP tools, it has almost the same features. When the information required has been captured, then it is very easy to "formalize" it. The map2owl plug in talks to the OWL plug in, this makes it possible to have the cmpa view and the OWL-plug in view synchronized. The direct manipulation interface provided also facilitates that domain experts work directly with the ontology without being aware of this.
During the development of ontologies the knowledge elicitation is
facilitated by means of cmaps; one can also use other methods and
techniques, but from my experience CMAPS are quite useful, particularly
when developing ontologies -within the ontology community others have
other opinions about concept maps.
The url for the map2owl plug in is
http://map2owl.sourceforge.net/ Please don't be afraid, I have not had any time to translate the web site in English, so for the moment the information in that url is in Spanish. But the plug in it self is in English. It does work with Protege 3.X not with P4 -not yet.
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 6:09 AM, Pat Hayes <
phayes@xxxxxxx> wrote:
At 10:03 PM -0400 4/10/08, John F. Sowa wrote:
I wanted to elaborate Pat's comment:
PH> COE does not have the capability to transform any arbitrary
> Cmap into OWL, but we think it is a useful first step.
Alan Perlis once remarked that it is impossible to translate
an informal representation to a formal representation by
any formal algorithm.
Concept maps were originally designed as an informal notation
used in education. COE implements a highly disciplined
(i.e., formalized) version of Cmaps that can be automatically
translated to OWL (a formally defined language).
It also does the translations in both directions, of course.
On the other hand, informal Cmaps can be a useful intermediate
stage in a human-assisted translation to a more formal
notation.
Yes, quite. We have used this technique successfully in several
projects at IHMC, and it was the basis for the successful Darpa RKF
system built a few years ago at SRI (which used an interface based on
CMapTools.) Constructing informal (but well-constructed) Cmaps turns
out to be one the most effective techniques for 'knowledge extraction'
from domain experts. There are number of publications on the general
topic downloadable from
http://cmap.ihmc.us/Publications/
BTW, ironically, COE will 'translate' any content it does not
recognize in any Cmap into plain RDF triples, which is technically
legal RDF, though it may not capture the intentions of the Cmap
authors, of course.
Pat
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
Alexander Garcia
http://www.usefilm.com/photographer/75943.html
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (01)