ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Adverbs (was Anthropology of Colour)

To: edbark@xxxxxxxx
Cc: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Pat Hayes <phayes@xxxxxxx>
Date: 2008年3月18日 10:23:47 -0500
Message-id: <p0623090cc4058dfb7193@[10.100.0.20] >
At 7:23 PM -0400 3/17/08, Ed Barkmeyer wrote:
Christopher Menzel wrote:
> Ed Barkmeyer wrote:
>> I wrote:
>>
>>>> That is the point I thought should not be lost: Formalization turns
>>>> adjectives, including colour attribution, into predicates ("verbs").
>> Pat Hayes wrote:
>>> I wouldn't say for a second that predicates in FOL have any clear
>>> connection with verbs in English.
>> Upon reflection, I have to agree. Logical predicates seem to
>> represent nouns, adjectives, verbs and adverbs without prejudice.
>
> Not adverbs, typically. In a standard logical language, sentences like
>
> (1) John buttered the toast
>
> and
>
> (2) John buttered the toast slowly
>
> would have to be represented using completely different predicates, one
> for "buttered" and another for "slowly buttered", e.g., "Bjt" and "Sjt"
> or "Buttered(john,thetoast)" and "SlowlyButtered(john,thetoast)". This
> is very unsatisfactory, however, as sentence (1) obviously follows from
> (2), whereas "Bjt" obviously does not follow from "Sjt".

Chris is quite right, of course.
Having recently been exposed to some IKL-like phrasing, I have seen
things like:

(WasSlowly (THAT (Buttered John Toast)))
But that is most definitely NOT FOL.

True, but it is closely related to something that is legal CLIF (if not GOFOL):

(and (WasSlowly A)
(iff (A)(Buttered John Toast))
)

A here stands for the nested THAT-proposition. But although this is legal, I don't think its a very good analysis of the meaning. What it says is that the proposition that John buttered toast is slowly. Doesn't seem right to me.

Pat




-Ed

--
Edward J. Barkmeyer Email: edbark@xxxxxxxx
National Institute of Standards & Technology
Manufacturing Systems Integration Division
100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8263 Tel: +1 301-975-3528
Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8263 FAX: +1 301-975-4694

"The opinions expressed above do not reflect consensus of NIST,
and have not been reviewed by any Government authority."


_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC(850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home
40 South Alcaniz St.(850)202 4416 office
Pensacola(850)202 4440 fax
FL 32502(850)291 0667 cell
http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us
http://www.flickr.com/pathayes/collections

_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ 
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ 
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  (01)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [ontolog-forum] Anthropology of Colour , Pat Hayes
Next by Date: Re: [ontolog-forum] Adverbs (was Anthropology of Colour) , Pat Hayes
Previous by Thread: Re: [ontolog-forum] Adverbs (was Anthropology of Colour) , Pat Hayes
Next by Thread: Re: [ontolog-forum] Adverbs (was Anthropology of Colour) , Ed Barkmeyer
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /