ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Scheduling a Discussion [was: CL, CG, IKL and the re

To: "John F. Sowa" <sowa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Pat Hayes <phayes@xxxxxxx>
Date: 2008年1月17日 16:14:01 -0600
Message-id: <p06230905c3b570291e12@[10.100.0.9] >
At 2:41 AM -0500 1/17/08, John F. Sowa wrote:
Pat,

As I keep saying, I don't think we disagree. I have no quarrel
with your summary of the kinds of things that have been discussed
when people use the word 'context'.

....
But what I have been suggesting is that there is something common to
all of the above:

1. Syntax: There is some text -- in a broad sense, which could
include NL printed stuff, spoken snippets of conversation,
or some formal set of statements.
2. Semantics: That text is relevant to something, such as a
situation, in terms of which the pronouns and incompletely
specified references are resolved.

Hmm. This is interesting. There seem to be two distinct (and opposite?) senses used here. This 'something' might be what the text is, in some sense, 'about', the thing or part of the world which defines its topic, what the text is focused on; or it may be the overall 'background' in which the text is situated. In the latter case, it isn't necessarily what the text is actually about in any sense. So for example, in the case of a time-interval, the text which is "in" such a context might make no reference to times at all, and yet still require that the reader know what time it is 'set' in, in order to know that "the President" refers, say, to Jimmy Carter. Maybe you mean to cover both of these by speaking of 'relevance' but I wonder if its worth distinguishing them more exactly, as they really do seem different, and maybe need different syntactic treatment.

Pat
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
IHMC(850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973 home
40 South Alcaniz St.(850)202 4416 office
Pensacola(850)202 4440 fax
FL 32502(850)291 0667 cell
phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ 
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ 
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  (01)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [ontolog-forum] Scheduling a Discussion [was: CL, CG, IKL and the relationship between symbols in the logical "universe of discourse" and individuals in the "real world"] , Deborah MacPherson
Next by Date: Re: [ontolog-forum] Scheduling a Discussion [was: CL, CG, IKL and the relationship between symbols in the logical "universe of discourse" and individuals in the "real world"] , John Black
Previous by Thread: Re: [ontolog-forum] Scheduling a Discussion [was: CL, CG, IKL and the relationship between symbols in the logical "universe of discourse" and individuals in the "real world"] , John F. Sowa
Next by Thread: Re: [ontolog-forum] Scheduling a Discussion [was: CL, CG, IKL and the relationship between symbols in the logical "universe of discourse" and individuals in the "real world"] , John F. Sowa
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /