ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] A "common basis"

To: "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Kathryn Blackmond Laskey <klaskey@xxxxxxx>
Date: 2007年5月02日 22:16:21 -0400
Message-id: <p06110412c25ef457272d@[129.174.88.203] >
Pat -  (01)
> To say there are protons "in the nucleus" does not make any
>commitment as to whether the thing called "proton" is a point particle
>or a distributed wave function;  (02) 
I wasn't talking about localization. I was talking about the 
existence of a "thing" we can call a proton. In quantum mechanics 
there are no distinguishable "things" we can identify as individual 
protons. Rather, there is only one "thing" we can identify as an 
n-proton wave function, where n is the number of protons in the 
universe. In relativistic quantum theory, there isn't even a 
definite number of protons. There is just a mass-energy function 
that gives probabilities that if proton-localization experiments are 
conducted at given locations, proton-detection events will occur.  (03)
K  (04)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ 
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ 
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  (05)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date: Re: [ontolog-forum] A "common basis" , Kathryn Blackmond Laskey
Next by Date: Re: [ontolog-forum] A "common basis" , Gary Berg-Cross
Previous by Thread: Re: [ontolog-forum] A "common basis" , Cassidy, Patrick J.
Next by Thread: Re: [ontolog-forum] A "common basis" , Cassidy, Patrick J.
Indexes: [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /