[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
I've BCC'd this to a third party to see how mutt handles it <grin>. Eric On Fri, Apr 18, 2003 at 01:11:44PM -0400, Arthur S. Alexion wrote: > I just learned on the Evolution list that some servers add the header > Apparently-to: identifying BCC recipients. > > In Windows, I have always used Pegasus as my MUA. Pegasus sends out > separate mails whenever there is a BCC, to insure security. I thought > all MUAs did this. > > Are the other Linux MUAs broken like Evolution? Is it a flaw in the > standard that permits this? > > In my work BCCs and their privacy are critical. It's a "don't use this > software for serious work" issue. > -- > Arthur S. Alexion <arthur@alexion.com> > Arthur S. Alexion LLC -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ # Eric Lucas ======================================================================== Property rights are not the rights of property; they are the rights of HUMANS with regard to property. They are a particular kind of human right. -- David Friedman _________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug