[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
I just learned on the Evolution list that some servers add the header Apparently-to: identifying BCC recipients. In Windows, I have always used Pegasus as my MUA. Pegasus sends out separate mails whenever there is a BCC, to insure security. I thought all MUAs did this. Are the other Linux MUAs broken like Evolution? Is it a flaw in the standard that permits this? In my work BCCs and their privacy are critical. It's a "don't use this software for serious work" issue. -- Arthur S. Alexion <arthur@alexion.com> Arthur S. Alexion LLC _________________________________________________________________________ Philadelphia Linux Users Group -- http://www.phillylinux.org Announcements - http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug-announce General Discussion -- http://lists.netisland.net/mailman/listinfo/plug