Home
This link currently points to a static file while we finalize the details of the software platform to replace Manila, and try to provide all the features you've come to rely on when using LtU.
If you want to help, especially if you have experience with Drupal, let us know.
Posted to admin by Ehud Lamm on 6/16/04; 1:52:49 PM
Discuss
More information, as soon as I have it.
Posted to admin by Ehud Lamm on 6/15/04; 1:59:19 PM
Discuss (1 response)
Posted to history by Ehud Lamm on 6/15/04; 5:29:09 AM
Discuss
Guido's presentation outlines the future of Python as he sees it. It includes a discussion of generator expressions.
How Python is developed by Marc-Andre Lemburg provides a nice overview of the Python design process.
Posted to Python by Ehud Lamm on 6/14/04; 1:06:07 PM
Discuss (1 response)
Another reason is that it seems no one has published exciting new results recently... Or am I mistaken? Let me know using the discussion group.
Posted to general by Ehud Lamm on 6/14/04; 7:40:33 AM
Discuss (3 responses)
I started this article by saying that code generation was important and it was something that you need to understand. Why is that? It's not just because today's frameworks are code-intensive. It's also because the code that generators build is far more consistent in form and quality than hand code.I've done a fair bit of code generation for various purposes but I can't help but think that much of the need for using the technique lies with the facilities of the language. Ran across an opinion a while back that took the extreme POV:
Blanchard's law: Systems that require code generation lack sufficient power to tackle the problem at hand.My opinion probably lies somewhere in between: code generation is a useful programming approach but it many times indicates a fault in the underlying programming language to capture the necessary abstractions. (of course, the lines between compiler, interpreter and code generation are rather blurry).
(We've discussed Chaitin before).
Posted to fun by andrew cooke on 6/11/04; 12:40:04 PM
Discuss (2 responses)
Now at last we can have meaningful, objective measurements to decide what the best programming language is! :-)
Posted to fun by Brent Fulgham on 6/11/04; 12:39:56 PM
Discuss (2 responses)
Posted to logic/declarative by Ehud Lamm on 6/9/04; 4:02:27 AM
Discuss