ISO/ IEC JTC1/SC22/WG14 N827

 SC22/WG14 N827
 Editor's Report
 May 22, 1998
 1. Major changes from CD1
 Lots of reorganization:
 -- Requirements that used to be in Definitions and
 conventions (clause 2) have been moved to Conformance
 (clause 4) in accordance with Part 3 of the ISO
 Directives.
 -- The long-deferred reorganization of the beginning of
 the Language clause (6.1 and 6.2) specified in N672 has
 been completed with minor adjustments due to changes
 made since N672 was adopted.
 -- The requirements for the predefined identifier __func__
 have been moved from Primary expressions (6.5.1) to
 Identifiers (6.4.2), replacing the forward reference
 that used to be there.
 -- The UCN requirements that were spread all over the
 place have been collected into their own subclause
 (6.4.3).
 -- The Library clause (7) is now ordered alphabetically by
 header name and the headers that were previously under
 7.1 have been moved up and ordered appropriately.
 -- Each library subclause that contains function
 definitions is now ordered alphabetically by function
 name.
 -- The functions in <complex.h> has been organized into
 subclauses that parallel <math.h>.
 -- <inttypes.h> has been split into <inttypes.h> and
 <stdint.h>.
 -- The Bibliography is no longer an annex and appears
 after the annexes in accordance with Part 3 of the ISO
 Directives.
 Note: In general, I've suppressed the diff marks that would
 normally result from moving a whole subclause in order to
 avoid hiding any changes to the actual text of the
 subclause.
 The draft has been (mostly) updated to conform to Part 3 of
 the ISO Directives. This involved minor reformatting of the

 2 SC22/WG14 N827
 Normative references (clause 2) and the footnotes, and major
 reformatting of the Definitions and conventions (clause 3,
 now Terms and definitions) and the examples. It also
 involved removing all instances of the word ``must'' from
 the draft (``must'' is reserved for legal obligations).
 Definitions are only allowed to contain actual definitions
 in the normative text; anything else must be a note or an
 example. Things that were obviously requirements have been
 moved elsewhere (generally to Conformance, see above), the
 examples that used to be at the end of the clause have been
 distributed to the appropriate definitions, anything else
 has been made into a note. (Some of the notes appear to be
 requirements, but I haven't figured out a good place to put
 them yet.)
 The dates and titles of all the ISO, IEC, and ANSI documents
 in the Normative references (clause 2) and Bibliography have
 been double-checked.
 TR 10176 has been removed from Normative references (clause
 2) because there are no normative references to it (the
 normative references are to annex H).
 The title of clause 4 has been changed from ``Compliance''
 to the more accurate ``Conformance''.
 <stdbool.h> and <stdint.h> are now required for freestanding
 implementations, complex support is not.
 The UCN wording has been harmonized with the C++ standard as
 discussed at the last meeting.
 The Recommended practices have been slightly reworded to
 conform to Part 3 of the ISO Directives.
 <complex.h> and <math.h> subclauses now include the
 prototypes for the float and long double versions of the
 functions.
 There have been minor corrections to the specifications of
 atanh, nextafter, and logb in <math.h>.
 The specifications for fprintf and fwprintf now come from a
 common source file, so there are no longer any gratuitous
 differences in wording between them. Similarly for fscanf
 and fwscanf.
 I've taken the liberty of defining the term length modifier
 to refer to the h, l, etc. that can appear before a
 conversion specifier. This makes the specifications easier
 to understand and gives us a term we can use to refer to
 them elsewhere.

 SC22/WG14 N827 3
 I've added the %F conversion specifier to the scanf
 functions on the assumption that we just overlooked it when
 we added it to printf.
 The changes specified in the minutes of the previous meeting
 (N812) including documents N804, N808, N809, and N810 have
 been applied. I have also applied the changes specified by
 editorial review groups in N816 and N817.
 There have been lots of little formatting and wording
 changes based on public and private comments -- all are
 noted by diff marks in the draft.
 2. Open Issues
 Still need final words for a real boolean type (see N815).
 Need to work out the interaction of VLAs with mixed
 declarations and code.
 The index still needs more work.
 The text version of the draft has not been reviewed and
 contains numerous formatting problems such as superscripts
 overprinting information from the previous line and
 unintelligible expressions.
 There are many typesetting issues still to be addressed.
 For example, there are many equations typeset as code and
 vice versa, particularly in annexes E and F. Some of these
 issues primarily affect the typeset version and some
 primarily affect the text version.
 All hyphenated terms should be examined to determine where
 the hyphenation is appropriate and where it isn't. All
 italicized terms should also be examined.
 All of the cross references need to be checked for relevance
 and accuracy.
 The draft still needs some work to fully comply with Part 3
 of the ISO Directives. The major issues remaining are:
 -- the Notes in Definitions mentioned above
 -- the formatting of tables
 -- we have many subclauses that contain text in addition
 to subordinate subclauses; ISO strongly discourages
 this
 -- all references to a specific version of a standard must
 include the date; it is not sufficient to include the

 4 SC22/WG14 N827
 date only in the Normative references or the
 Bibliography as we currently do
 -- annexes are required to appear in the order in which
 they are cited in the text (and thus there has to be a
 citation for each annex); if anyone has any strong
 feelings about ordering, please let me know
 -- ISO requires numbers to be formatted with a comma for
 the decimal-point character and digits before and after
 the decimal-point character to be in space-separated
 groups of three; I believe we have more than adequate
 justification for ignoring this requirement
 -- Larry Jones


AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /