coolmenu 最近回复了
下象棋,国际象棋都行。年龄大了,爱好从围棋转到国象和中象了
x 鱼上买 cursor 的商用额度账号也行,我看 80 美元是 100 多?用完了再说
自己弄点小项目的话,antigravity+codex 组合,要是大项目,订阅 200 刀的 claude 吧。
司美是打针还是吃药?我有点晕针,想买口服的版本。现在是每天走 8 公里,肚子的肚腩小了不少,晚上有时候超慢跑 30 分钟( 180 节拍),也是晚上不吃碳水。瘦了 10 多斤,但是卡住了。
gemini 必须要有,量大,便宜 ,用 antigravity 。gpt/claude 二选一,claude 不订 100 刀,基本上 opus 不可用。HN 引用:Codex is so so good at finding bugs and little inconsistencies, it's astounding to me. Where Claude Code is good at "raw coding", Codex/GPT5.x are unbeatable in terms of careful, methodical finding of "problems" (be it in code, or in math).
Yes, it takes longer (quality, not speed please!) -- but the things that it finds consistently astound me.: 我觉得 gpt + gemini 就够了。
喷了,是不是用 windsurf 开发的扣费业务。
Tried Gemini 3 for coding and I think it just gaslit my entire repo
Did a "quick assessment" of Gemini 3 for coding and I’m convinced this thing is either a genius or legally insane.
I asked it to refactor one file. It refactored my entire project. Then told me "btw your architecture was concerning" like a disappointed parent.
It writes code like it’s getting graded by God. It leaves comments like "fixed this, you’re welcome." It reorganized my utils folder without asking — bold move honestly.
Performance verdict: Code: 10/10 Mental stability: 2/10 Vibes: immaculate
Would I use it again? Absolutely. Do I understand anything it produced? Not even slightly.:reddit 上的帖子, 多名用户反馈同一现象:
Gemini 3 在编码任务上非常强,但会过度自信、越权大改、强行 refactor 、删除"它认为没用的代码",哪怕明确告诉它"不要动其他文件"。