for the following code
a =func()
if a != None:
b.append(a)
a can be assigned to None, is there a way to avoid the if statement and only use one line of code?
original problem is the following
import xml.etree.ElementTree as etree
r = etree.parse(f).getroot()
b = etree.Element('register',{})
a = r.find('tag_name') # a may get None if did not find it
if a != None:
b.append(a)
ok, I used all the answers and got this, personally I think it's the most complex python I have ever wrote so far, lol
NS_MAP = {
'spirit' : 'http://www.spiritconsortium.org/XMLSchema/SPIRIT/1.4',
'app' : 'http://www.app.com/SPIRIT-app'
}
mp=etree.Element('MemoryProperty', {'version':'alpha'})
mpt=etree.ElementTree(mp)
def copy_tags(tp, op, p, tn, ns='spirit'):
c = p.find('{%s}%s'%(NS_MAP[ns],tn))
if c is not None:
(op == '<-') and tp.append(c)
return c
for reg in regs:
te = etree.Element('register',{})
copy_tags(te,'<-',reg,'name')
copy_tags(te,'<-',reg,'addressOffset')
copy_tags(te,'<-',reg,'access')
(lambda e, t: copy_tags(te,'<-',t,'usageConstraints',ns='app') if t is not None else None)(te, copy_tags(te,'|',reg,'vendorExtensions'))
mp.append(te)
mpt.write('map_gen.xml')
9 Answers 9
If you can call func() beforehand, and you want to combine the test and assignment statements into a single statement, then you can do this, with an if-else expression:
b += [a] if a is not None else []
If a is not None, then this will add [a] to b -- essentially the same operation as b.append(a)
If a is None, then this will add [] to b, which will leave b unchanged.
This won't work unless b is a list, or at least supports "+=" in-place addition. If it doesn't -- perhaps it's some custom object, then you should be able to do this:
(b.append(a) if a is not None else None)
This is an expression, evaluated for its side effects, and then thrown away. If a is None, then the b.append(a)
call will never be executed. In either case, the value of the expression is None, but we don't care about it, so it gets ignored.
Now, if you want to combine the func() call with this, then you'll have to do something different in order to avoid calling func twice. If you can use the "+=" syntax, then you can do it like this:
b += filter(None, [func()])
filter(None, <list>)
returns the list with all false elements (None included, but also 0 and []) removed. This statement, then, will add either [func()] or [] to b.
[Edited]
Finally, for the worst case scenario: If you can't call func() more than once, and you can't use b += <list>
, and you need to accept 0, "", [], etc, and only exclude None
, and you need it all on one line, here's the ugliest line of code yet:
(lambda l, a: l.append(a) if a is not None else None)(b, func())
This is essentially @ekhumoro's solution, compressed into one line. It defines an anonymous function, calls it, discards the value, and then discards the function, all for the sake of the side effect.
Now, this is a single line, but it's certainly not easier to read or understand than the original code. If I were you, I'd stick with the original, or go with @ekhumoro's idea of just defining a helper function and using that.
-
Problem is, where do you call
func()
? You probably don't want to call the thing several times. I'd be really interested in seeing this solution wherea
is replaced with a function call that only gets called once (in one line). Commented Jan 11, 2012 at 21:05 -
b is actually a class of xml.etree.ElementTree so, I am not sure the [] notation can work. Commented Jan 11, 2012 at 21:14
-
why not just b+=[a] if a else []...instead of the if part, you would still have to call a=func() beforehand. Sorry I guess that's the part you don't like– MattCommented Jan 11, 2012 at 21:22
-
-
For one line I like Ian's...but it seems a bit difficult to read/overkill– MattCommented Jan 11, 2012 at 21:28
if a := func(): b.append(a)
-
6
-
Exactly what I was looking for, I didn't know that existed - thanks a lot :)– XhattamCommented Oct 2, 2024 at 10:37
You asked the wrong question here. The clue is in your reply to one of the comments where you say "I have 10+ tags, if I can get 3 line to 1 line, I will save 20+ lines".
So your problem actually is not that you have 3 lines of code but that you are needlessly repeating 3 lines of code over and over. You could use a function to extract the repeated lines, but it sounds like in this case you may actually want a loop:
THE_TAGS = ('tag1', 'tag2', 'and so on')
for tag in THE_TAGS:
a = r.find(tag) # a may get None if did not find it
if a != None:
b.append(a)
Or if you need to append to different lists:
def extract_tag(r, tag_name, to):
a = r.find(tag_name) # a may get None if did not find it
if a != None:
to.append(a)
extract_tag(r, 'tag1', b)
extract_tag(r, 'tag2', c)
-
I was just wondering if I can avoid the if, but this is also good. the reason I did not use is because one of the tag had a different namespace, only one... Commented Jan 11, 2012 at 21:58
-
@JerryGao: "different namespace" should not be a problem ...
taglist = ["{ns1}tag1", "{ns2}tag2", etc]
. Please explain. Commented Jan 11, 2012 at 22:48 -
@JohnMachin for my case it's taglist = ["{ns1}tag1", "{ns1}tag2","{ns1}tag3", ... , "{ns0}TAG"] Commented Jan 11, 2012 at 23:05
-
@JerryGao: You still haven't said what is your problem with namespaces. Why can't you use this answer (or mine)? Commented Jan 12, 2012 at 0:09
Short answer: Not really.
Longer answer: If you really wanted to avoid this (perhaps because you want to implement this behavior --- appending only non-None values) from several different blocks of code) then you could create a class as a proxy around the underlying b object and hide the details in its append method.
class NonNoneAppender:
def __init__(self, obj):
if not hasattr(obj, 'append') or not callable(obj.append):
raise ValueError, "Object must have append method"
self.__obj = obj
def append(self, item):
if item is not None:
return self.__obj.append(item)
def __getattr__(self, attr):
return getattr( self.__obj, attr)
... and then you could do something like:
b = NonNoneAppender(b)
However, I'm not sure this would make any sense at all for your code.
-
1
-
@John Machin: DOh! Ummm ... yeah, I should have. That's just 'for i in items: self.append(i)' Commented Jan 12, 2012 at 4:53
Attacking your real problem, and doing it in two lines for clarity:
temp = [r.find(tag) for tag in list_of_tags]
b.extend(x for x in temp if x is not None)
Note: Element.extend
is new in Python 2.7/3.2
-
+1 for extend -- although you may want to note that it's Python 2.7-only. Commented Jan 12, 2012 at 0:49
Presumably you're not trying to remove just a single if
statement from your code...
So the obvious answer is to use a function:
import xml.etree.ElementTree as etree
def append(parent, child):
if child is not None:
parent.append(child)
r = etree.parse(f).getroot()
b = etree.Element('register',{})
append(b, r.find('tag_name'))
-
I was just wondering if I can avoid the if, but this is also good. Commented Jan 11, 2012 at 21:42
You can just add everything and remove Nones at the end with b = [a for a in b if b is not None]
. Or, in your particular use case, you can do b.extend(r.findall('tag_name')[:1])
. This may be a bit slower, however, as it will go through the whole tree, rather than stopping at the first instance.
(Should be comment to this answer but I don't have enough reputation)
Keep in mind that walrus operator can be quite surprising.
Variable that walrus is assigning to will be not local to eg. if block:
if a := func(): b.append(a) print(a) # a just leaked to upper scope
Walrus operator has low precedence, so when used in comparison must be surrounded in parentheses, or comparison will be evaluated first.
def func(x): return x b = [] if a := func(7) == 7: b.append(a) print(a, "appended !") # prints: True appended !
b+=list(set([r.find('tag_name')])-set([None]))
But it's very ugly. A little cleaner, but also a line longer:
b.append(r.find('tag_name'))
b.remove(None)
Still not very neat though. If I were you I'd just keep that if
statement.
-
-1
b.append(None)
raises an exception"TypeError: must be Element, not None
Commented Jan 12, 2012 at 0:11 -
I was using cElementTree. The ElementTree behaviour is IMHO a bug. See bugs.python.org/issue13782 Commented Jan 14, 2012 at 0:58
-
1Another problem: If the
r.find()
finds something,b.remove(None)
fails with a ValueError. Commented Jan 14, 2012 at 1:07
b = [x for x in funcList if x is not None]
? It's hard to tell what exactly you're trying for here.