I am constructing a doubly linked list and I am struggling on construct a doubly linked list iterator method in PYTHON.
This is my code so far
class DoubleListNode:
def __init__(self,data):
self.data=data
self.prev = None
self.next= None
class ListIterator:
def __init__(self):
self._current = self.head
def __iter__(self):
return self
def next(self):
if self.size == 0 :
raise StopIteration
else:
item = self._current.data
self._current=self._current.next
return item
class DoublyLinkedList:
def __init__(self):
self.head= None
self.tail= None
self.size = 0
def add(self,data):
newnode= DoubleListNode(data)
self.size+=1
if self.head is None:
self.head = newnode
self.tail = self.head
elif data < self.head.data: # before head
newnode.next = self.head
self.head.prev= newnode
self.head= newnode
elif data > self.tail.data: # at the end
newnode.prev= self.tail
self.tail.next= newnode
self.tail=newnode
else:
curNode = self.head
while curNode is not None and curNode.data < data:
curNode=curNode.next
newnode.next= curNode
newnode.prev=curNode.prev
curNode.prev.next= newnode
curNode.prev=newnode
def remove(self,data):
curNode=self.head
while curNode is not None and curNode.data!= data:
curNode= curNode.next
if curNode is not None:
self.size -= 1
if curNode is self.head:
self.head= curNode.next
else:
curNode.prev.next=curNode.next
if curNode is self.tail:
self.tail=curNode.prev
else:
curNode.next.prev=curNode.prev
When I run a test it said TypeError: iteration over non-sequence
. Did I do something wrong ?
5 Answers 5
As posted, the code doesn't initialize (i.e. self.head isn't defined).
But overall, you are on the right track. Take a look at the source for Python's collections.OrderedDict for a worked-out example of traversing a doubly linked list.
Here's a simplified example:
class Link:
def __init__(self, value, prev=None, next=None):
self.value = value
self.prev = prev
self.next = next
def __iter__(self):
here = self
while here:
yield here.value
here = here.next
def __reversed__(self):
here = self
while here:
yield here.value
here = here.prev
if __name__ == '__main__':
a = Link('raymond')
b = Link('rachel', prev=a); a.next=b
c = Link('matthew', prev=b); b.next=c
print 'Forwards:'
for name in a:
print name
print
print 'Backwards:'
for name in reversed(c):
print name
1 Comment
TypeError: iteration over non-sequence
means that Python cannot find an __iter__ method for an object. Also note that in Python 3, we use __next__ instead of next.I think there are two important things to fix.
First, your DoublyLinkedList
class doesn't have an __iter__
method. You probably want to create one that returns a ListIterator
instance. Perhaps you're trying to do this manually, but this would be the normal approach.
Second, you need to fix the code in your ListIterator
to work properly. Currently your __init__
method doesn't initialize things correctly, and your next
method tries to access member variables like size
that don't exist.
Here's an implementation that I think will work:
def ListIterator(object):
def __init__(self, node):
self.current = node
def __iter__(self):
return self
def next(self):
if self.current is None:
raise StopIteration()
result = self.current.data
self.current = self.current.next
return result
class DoublyLinkedList(object):
# all your current stuff, plus:
def __iter__(self):
return ListIterator(self.head)
As a side note, in your current code you're defining classes with no bases. This is fine in Python 3 (where object
will be the base by default), but in Python 2 this will result in getting an "old-style" class. Old-style classes are deprecated, and you'll find that some language features won't work properly with them (though not any of the features involved in iteration, as far as I know). On the other hand, if you are already using Python 3 then you need to define a __next__
method in the iterator class, rather than next
(without the underscores).
Comments
Here is an example for Doubly Linked List class.
class Node:
def __init__(self, val):
self.data = val
self.next = None
self.prev = None
class LinkedList:
def __init__(self):
self.head = None
self.tail = None
self.count = 0
def insert(self, val):
newNode = Node(val)
if self.count == 0:
self.head = newNode
self.tail = newNode
else:
self.head.prev = newNode
newNode.next = self.head
self.head = newNode
self.count += 1
def insertToEnd(self, val):
newNode = Node(val)
if self.count == 0:
self.head = newNode
self.tail = newNode
else:
self.tail.next = newNode
newNode.prev = self.tail
self.tail = newNode
self.count += 1
def search(self, val):
p = self.head
while p is not None:
if p.data == val:
return p
p = p.next
def delete(self, val):
curNode = self.head
while curNode != None:
if curNode.data == val:
if curNode.prev != None:
curNode.prev.next = curNode.next
else:
self.head = curNode.next
if curNode.next != None:
curNode.next.prev = curNode.prev
else:
self.tail = curNode.prev
self.count -= 1
curNode = curNode.next
def show(self):
s = ""
p = self.head
while p is not None:
s += str(p.data) + ' ';
p = p.next
print(s + "| count: " + str(self.count))
Comments
Based on what you post, may I suggest:
class ListIterator:
# other stuff ...
def __iter__(self):
while self._current:
yield self._current.data
self._current = self._current.next
self._current = self.head # Reset the current pointer
You don't have to implement next()
Update
Here is an example usage:
for data in myListIterator:
print data
# Without reset, the second time around won't work:
for data in myListIterator:
print data
Comments
If you're just iterating/traversing through the linked list you can try a basic set up for both the node and the Doublyll
objects, and replace the val
with whatever you defined in your code:
class Node:
def __init__(self, val):
self.val = val
self.next = None
self.prev = None
class Doublyll:
def __init__(self):
self.head = None
self.tail = None
self.size = 0
def traversal(self):
curr = self.head
while curr:
print(curr.val, end='--')
curr = curr.next
print('None')
__init__
where isself.head
coming from? And how do you iterate?ListIterator
object? Something is definitely wrong there, sinceself._current = self.head
will raise andAttributeError
in__init__()
.