46

Im trying to transmit a string from client to ASP.NET MVC4 application.

But I can not receive the string, either it is null or the post method can not be found (404 error)

Client Code to transmit the string (Console Application):

HttpWebRequest request = (HttpWebRequest)WebRequest.Create("http://localhost:49032/api/test");
request.Credentials = new NetworkCredential("user", "pw");
request.Method = "POST";
string postData = "Short test...";
byte[] byteArray = Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes(postData);
request.ContentType = "application/x-www-form-urlencoded";
request.ContentLength = byteArray.Length;
Stream dataStream = request.GetRequestStream();
dataStream.Write(byteArray, 0, byteArray.Length);
dataStream.Close();
WebResponse response = request.GetResponse();
Console.WriteLine(((HttpWebResponse)response).StatusDescription);
dataStream = response.GetResponseStream();
StreamReader reader = new StreamReader(dataStream);
string responseFromServer = reader.ReadToEnd();
Console.WriteLine(responseFromServer);
reader.Close();
dataStream.Close();
response.Close();
Console.ReadLine();

ASP.NET Web Api Controller:

public class TestController : ApiController
{
 [Authorize]
 public String Post(byte[] value)
 {
 return value.Length.ToString();
 }
}

In that case I'm able to call the "Post" method, but "value" is NULL. If I change the method signature to (string value) than it will never called.

Even "without" the [Authorize] setting it has the same strange behavior. -> So it has nothing to do with the user authentication.

Any ideas what I'm doing wrong? I'm grateful for any help.

Ian R. O'Brien
6,9409 gold badges47 silver badges74 bronze badges
asked Dec 7, 2012 at 21:11

7 Answers 7

63

You seem to have used some [Authorize] attribute on your Web API controller action and I don't see how this is relevant to your question.

So, let's get into practice. Here's a how a trivial Web API controller might look like:

public class TestController : ApiController
{
 public string Post([FromBody] string value)
 {
 return value;
 }
}

and a consumer for that matter:

class Program
{
 static void Main()
 {
 using (var client = new WebClient())
 {
 client.Headers[HttpRequestHeader.ContentType] = "application/x-www-form-urlencoded";
 var data = "=Short test...";
 var result = client.UploadString("http://localhost:52996/api/test", "POST", data);
 Console.WriteLine(result);
 }
 }
}

You will undoubtedly notice the [FromBody] decoration of the Web API controller attribute as well as the = prefix of the POST data on the client side. I would recommend you reading about how does the Web API does parameter binding to better understand the concepts.

As far as the [Authorize] attribute is concerned, this could be used to protect some actions on your server from being accessible only to authenticated users. Actually it is pretty unclear what you are trying to achieve here.You should have made this more clear in your question by the way. Are you are trying to understand how parameter bind works in ASP.NET Web API (please read the article I've linked to if this is your goal) or are attempting to do some authentication and/or authorization? If the second is your case you might find the following post that I wrote on this topic interesting to get you started.

And if after reading the materials I've linked to, you are like me and say to yourself, WTF man, all I need to do is POST a string to a server side endpoint and I need to do all of this? No way. Then checkout ServiceStack. You will have a good base for comparison with Web API. I don't know what the dudes at Microsoft were thinking about when designing the Web API, but come on, seriously, we should have separate base controllers for our HTML (think Razor) and REST stuff? This cannot be serious.

burnsi
7,84815 gold badges23 silver badges37 bronze badges
answered Dec 7, 2012 at 21:56

10 Comments

Very interesting, if I use your client code, it works. It works with var data = "=..."; If I remove the "=" it doesnt work.
@user1011394, yeah, it's a WTF! Checkout ServiceStack. You're gonna love it.
@DarrelMiller ServiceStack does HTTP very well (not sure what is making you think otherwise), you can Customize the HTTP Response how you like, return any Response you wish and its HTML Support is implemented as it should be in a Web Fx i.e. HTML is just another Content-Type. Not sharing base classes is not good design, it's a self-imposed artificial restriction. SS does HTML + Self-Host using same interfaces.
@DarrelMiller just so no one thinks otherwise, ServiceStack also includes typed HttpMethods and HttpHeaders that's free to substitute instead of strings for those that prefer the use of typed constants.
@DarrelMiller There are constants for everything that's likely to be used by application developers. If you're referring to the hashset of all HTTP Verbs, that's the optimal storage used by the Framework to determine if a symbol is a HTTP method.
|
36

Web API works very nicely if you accept the fact that you are using HTTP. It's when you start trying to pretend that you are sending objects over the wire that it starts to get messy.

 public class TextController : ApiController
 {
 public HttpResponseMessage Post(HttpRequestMessage request) {
 var someText = request.Content.ReadAsStringAsync().Result;
 return new HttpResponseMessage() {Content = new StringContent(someText)};
 }
 }

This controller will handle a HTTP request, read a string out of the payload and return that string back.

You can use HttpClient to call it by passing an instance of StringContent. StringContent will be default use text/plain as the media type. Which is exactly what you are trying to pass.

 [Fact]
 public void PostAString()
 {
 var client = new HttpClient();
 var content = new StringContent("Some text");
 var response = client.PostAsync("http://oak:9999/api/text", content).Result;
 Assert.Equal("Some text",response.Content.ReadAsStringAsync().Result);
 }
answered Dec 8, 2012 at 1:29

3 Comments

+1 - I love Web API. I just learnt about HttpResponseMessage today and how you can create the response manually bypassing content-negotiation and serialization. I was wondering if there was something like that I could do for the request. Lo and behold here it is!
"accept the fact that you are using HTTP" Love it. :)
This is the best answer, since it doesn't require the client to do anything weird with the posted string.
5

For WebAPI, here is the code to retrieve body text without going through their special [FromBody] binding.

public class YourController : ApiController
{
 [HttpPost]
 public HttpResponseMessage Post()
 {
 string bodyText = this.Request.Content.ReadAsStringAsync().Result;
 //more code here...
 }
}
answered Mar 27, 2015 at 22:55

Comments

3

I use this code to post HttpRequests.

/// <summary>
 /// Post this message.
 /// </summary>
 /// <param name="url">URL of the document.</param>
 /// <param name="bytes">The bytes.</param>
 public T Post<T>(string url, byte[] bytes)
 {
 T item;
 var request = WritePost(url, bytes);
 using (var response = request.GetResponse() as HttpWebResponse)
 {
 item = DeserializeResponse<T>(response);
 response.Close();
 }
 return item;
 }
 /// <summary>
 /// Writes the post.
 /// </summary>
 /// <param name="url">The URL.</param>
 /// <param name="bytes">The bytes.</param>
 /// <returns></returns>
 private static HttpWebRequest WritePost(string url, byte[] bytes)
 {
 ServicePointManager.ServerCertificateValidationCallback = (sender, certificate, chain, errors) => true;
 HttpWebRequest request = (HttpWebRequest) WebRequest.Create(url);
 Stream stream = null;
 try
 {
 request.Headers.Clear();
 request.PreAuthenticate = true;
 request.Connection = null;
 request.Expect = null;
 request.KeepAlive = false;
 request.ContentLength = bytes.Length;
 request.Timeout = -1;
 request.Method = "POST";
 stream = request.GetRequestStream();
 stream.Write(bytes, 0, bytes.Length);
 }
 catch (Exception e)
 {
 GetErrorResponse(url, e);
 }
 finally
 {
 if (stream != null)
 {
 stream.Flush();
 stream.Close();
 }
 }
 return request;
 }

In regards to your code, try it without the content.Type (request.ContentType = "application/x-www-form-urlencoded";)

update

I believe the problem lies with how you are trying to retrieve the value. When you do a POST and send bytes via the Stream, they will not be passed into the action as a parameter. You'll need to retrieve the bytes via the stream on the server.

On the server, try getting the bytes from stream. The following code is what I use.

 /// <summary> Gets the body. </summary>
 /// <returns> The body. </returns>
 protected byte[] GetBytes()
 {
 byte[] bytes;
 using (var binaryReader = new BinaryReader(Request.InputStream))
 {
 bytes = binaryReader.ReadBytes(Request.ContentLength);
 }
 return bytes;
 }
answered Dec 7, 2012 at 21:26

3 Comments

Hi Chuck, thank you for your answer. I tried it. But the result is the same as with my code. On the server side the "Post" method is executed, but the value is NULL.
Your suggestion to retrieve the InputStream on the server side also doesn't work for me... Do we have any other possibilites to retrieve just a string instead of byte[] - that's all I need?
I am not sure what else to suggest. The above code, is the code we use to accomplish what you are attempting to achieve.
3

Darrel is of course right on with his response. One thing to add is that the reason why attempting to bind to a body containing a single token like "hello".

is that it isn’t quite URL form encoded data. By adding "=" in front like this:

=hello

it becomes a URL form encoding of a single key value pair with an empty name and value of "hello".

However, a better solution is to use application/json when uploading a string:

POST /api/sample HTTP/1.1
Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8
Host: host:8080
Content-Length: 7
"Hello"

Using HttpClient you can do it as follows:

HttpClient client = new HttpClient();
HttpResponseMessage response = await client.PostAsJsonAsync(_baseAddress + "api/json", "Hello");
string result = await response.Content.ReadAsStringAsync();
Console.WriteLine(result);

Henrik

answered Dec 9, 2012 at 19:27

1 Comment

This did not work for me, ended up with my parameter being null. Had to go with the form data method. Feels really hacky :/
2

i meet this problem, and find this article. http://www.jasonwatmore.com/post/2014/04/18/Post-a-simple-string-value-from-AngularJS-to-NET-Web-API.aspx

The solution I found was to simply wrap the string value in double quotes in your js post

works like a charm! FYI

answered May 4, 2015 at 10:12

1 Comment

This worked for me, but check the top comment on the article for the "why". In short, JSON.stringify(value) is better if you are using AngularJS.
-2
([FromBody] IDictionary<string,object> data)
answered Oct 16, 2015 at 11:16

Comments

Your Answer

Draft saved
Draft discarded

Sign up or log in

Sign up using Google
Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Required, but never shown

Post as a guest

Required, but never shown

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.