Have a question about calling one prototype function in another prototype function.
for instance lets say I have a basic slider with two prototype functions.
function Slider() {
}
Slider.prototype.transition = function() {
}
Slider.prototype.setTargets = function() {
}
What is the proper way of calling the setTargets function inside of the transition function so something like this:
Slider.prototype.transition = function() {
this.target.fadeOut('normal', function() {
// call setTargets?
this.setTargets(); // errors when i do this
});
}
thanks for the help
2 Answers 2
If this.target is an jQuery Object the callback of fadeOut will be called with this as the DOMNode.
Do this instead:
Slider.prototype.transition = function() {
var me = this;
this.target.fadeOut('normal', function() {
me.setTargets(); // <-- See me
});
}
I have chosen the name (削除) that (削除ここまで)me for all my initialized references to this. I never used (削除) that (削除ここまで)me for DomNodes, etc. makes sence for me.
Please see comments for furture views on this point.
EDIT:
Acually i used me not that - Dont know what im thinking ?? !
And for comment:
Slider.prototype.transition = function() {
var me = this;
this.target.fadeOut('normal', function() {
var domThis = this;
me.setTargets(); // <-- See me
setTimeout(function() {
// Use domThis [Dom Node]
}, 123);
});
}
Or:
You can make a jQuery object of this:
var $this = $(this);
me.setTargets(); // <-- See me
setTimeout(function() {
// Use $this [jQuery Object]
}, 123);
If you need the jQuery Object of this you can refer to: me.target
me.setTargets(); // <-- See me
setTimeout(function() {
// Use me.target [jQuery Object]
}, 123);
3 Comments
that. that makes no sense. self maybe... :-)self either, for some good reasons. Maybe name it slider like in my answer.The fadeOut function is not called in the context of your slider object.
Slider.prototype.transition = function() {
var slider = this;
this.target.fadeOut('normal', function() {
// call setTargets?
slider.setTargets(); // should work now.
});
}